2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hodge decomposition to solve singular static Maxwell's equations in a non-convex polygon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then one can deduce the solution to the static Maxwell equation. This method, that is well adapted for static problems, has been tested in [7] on the same numerical example. The result is reproduced on Fig.…”
Section: Electric Regular Casementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then one can deduce the solution to the static Maxwell equation. This method, that is well adapted for static problems, has been tested in [7] on the same numerical example. The result is reproduced on Fig.…”
Section: Electric Regular Casementioning
confidence: 98%
“…As for the case of the Hodge decomposition method (see [7]), it is better to solve (58) and (59) with a P 2 finite element method, to obtain a P 1 discrete approximation of u.…”
Section: Magnetic Singular Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [30]- [35] examined triangulation algorithms for polygons. References [36]- [41] provided useful algorithms for the rectangular and trapezoidal division of polygons. References [42]- [44] introduced algorithms for dividing polygons according to a given area size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, non-H 1 -space solutions are commonplace in electromagnetism. A main cause is due to the reentrant corners and edges along the domain boundary Γ and across the interfaces of different materials occupying the domain Ω (see [30,34,29,33,4,14] for details). For a non-H 1 -space solution, it has been widely recognized that the H 1 -conforming finite element solution of the eigenproblem (1.3) cannot correctly converge (e.g., see [17,45,49]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%