2022
DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2022.2091316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Hodling’ on: Memetic storytelling and digital folklore within a cryptocurrency world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Storytelling is therefore central to generating interest in cryptocurrencies and is integral to the communities' ownership of such decentralised assets (Helal and de Marco Costa, 2022). Storytelling promotes the formation of narratives and possibilities resulting in closer emotional bonds (Kemp et al, 2021) and high levels of anticipation around a particular coin, which is propagated in online communities (Yogarajah, 2022). This does not mean that such narratives are not authentic but illustrates the consumer-driven nature of trading behaviours, despite the controversial background of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.…”
Section: Social Drivers Of Cryptocurrency Tradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storytelling is therefore central to generating interest in cryptocurrencies and is integral to the communities' ownership of such decentralised assets (Helal and de Marco Costa, 2022). Storytelling promotes the formation of narratives and possibilities resulting in closer emotional bonds (Kemp et al, 2021) and high levels of anticipation around a particular coin, which is propagated in online communities (Yogarajah, 2022). This does not mean that such narratives are not authentic but illustrates the consumer-driven nature of trading behaviours, despite the controversial background of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.…”
Section: Social Drivers Of Cryptocurrency Tradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on theories of sociality which incorporate "non-humans, objects and things" into our understandings of human social relations (Long & Moore, 2012, p. 41), the discipline has come to account for the extent to which relations are mediated through and impacted by new information technologies. Whether on chat room forums (Yogarajah, 2022), Amazon's comment sections (Phillips & Milner, 2017) or image messaging apps (Miller, 2015), sociality has been found not to be limited online, but prevailing. When sociality is understood principally as "a dynamic relational matrix" by which subjects "come to know the world they live in and find…meaning within it" (Long & Moore, 2012, p. 41), it can be revealed in such sites as a social media platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnographic approaches are particularly suited to following the labels and ramifications of failure across scales, times, places, and different epistemological domains, not merely tracking gaps between reality and abstraction but bearing witness to the work performed by those abstractions. In part, this follows a disciplinary tradition of exploring alternative knowledge systems and how such epistemologies can be stifled by particular forms of ‘expert’ knowledge (Visvanathan 2016; Yogarajah 2022). The methodological and ethical capacity of ethnographers to think collaboratively with, across, and beyond boundaries, whether peoples, species, times, places, or other organizing categories (Haraway 2016; Ingold 2014), allows us both to see how lived worlds of failure continually exceed abstractions or reductive accounts, whether negative or positive, and to reflect on our own positional limits in evoking plurality and partiality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%