2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hofstede's dimensions of culture in international marketing studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
400
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(81 reference statements)
4
400
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Hofstede's model, based on comparisons and cultural distances between countries, has been criticised for its methodological development (Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006), in the formulation of the fifth dimension (Fang, 2003), because the consumer's behaviour does not always correspond to the differences between countries expressed by Hofstede (Yuksel, Kilinc, & Yuksel, 2006), or because nation cannot be equated with culture (McSweeney, 2002;Myers & Tan, 2003), but it is the model that has been most used to identify the cultural differences between countries (Soares, Farhangmehr, & Shoham, 2007) and that has most influenced cross-cultural management (Steenkamp, 2001 On the basis of these data, and following previous research (Liu, Furrer, & Sudharshan, 2001), we have taken into account for the interpretation of the results those two of Hofstede's dimensions in which these two groups are furthest apart in absolute values: individualism and uncertainty avoidance (see table 1).…”
Section: Cross-nationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hofstede's model, based on comparisons and cultural distances between countries, has been criticised for its methodological development (Kirkman, Lowe, & Gibson, 2006), in the formulation of the fifth dimension (Fang, 2003), because the consumer's behaviour does not always correspond to the differences between countries expressed by Hofstede (Yuksel, Kilinc, & Yuksel, 2006), or because nation cannot be equated with culture (McSweeney, 2002;Myers & Tan, 2003), but it is the model that has been most used to identify the cultural differences between countries (Soares, Farhangmehr, & Shoham, 2007) and that has most influenced cross-cultural management (Steenkamp, 2001 On the basis of these data, and following previous research (Liu, Furrer, & Sudharshan, 2001), we have taken into account for the interpretation of the results those two of Hofstede's dimensions in which these two groups are furthest apart in absolute values: individualism and uncertainty avoidance (see table 1).…”
Section: Cross-nationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, people's psychological processes "are likely to be configured in different ways across different socio-cultural groups" (Erez & Gati, 2004, p.568). Summarising the above, Triandis (2007, p.64) writes that culture comprises three main characteristics; it "emerges in adaptive interactions between humans and environments", it comprises shared elements and "is transmitted across time periods and generations" and, therefore, largely stable (Soares et al, 2007). In the following I consider several educationally-salient features of culture and show, in various ways, how they impact on students' opportunities to learn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those with high power always provide the direction to follow (Brettel, Engelen, Heinemann and Vadhanasindhu, 2008). Soares, Farhangmehr and Shoham (2007) state that power distance is the dimension which impacts consumers's behavior and decision making process significantly. In many African cultures, the authority and decision making power is based on age and experience (Grzeda and Assogbavi, 1999).…”
Section: The Impact Of Power Distance On Marketing Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%