1954
DOI: 10.1252/kakoronbunshu1953.18.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hold-up in a Wetted Wall Tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have proposed various models for calculating the film thickness in terms of theory. Nusselt was the first to propose equations for the falling film flow along a vertical tube but these were found to fail to predict the film thickness correctly, even for steady laminar conditions of flow . Kapitsa has proposed a model for predicting the film thickness on a plate, but it fails to predict the film thickness for turbulent flow .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have proposed various models for calculating the film thickness in terms of theory. Nusselt was the first to propose equations for the falling film flow along a vertical tube but these were found to fail to predict the film thickness correctly, even for steady laminar conditions of flow . Kapitsa has proposed a model for predicting the film thickness on a plate, but it fails to predict the film thickness for turbulent flow .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was offered as a possible explanation for the reported lack of agreement of the effect of diffusion on capacity data. An entirely different type of holdup was studied by Kamei and assistants (34). They used small wetted wall columns of 3 to about 2 inches in diameter and investigated thickness of liquid film by itself, in relation to concurrent gas flow and some other factors.…”
Section: Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%