1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hölder Continuity of Local Minimizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we prove Theorem 1.2. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 in [3], where the scalar case m = 1 is considered. However, differently from the scalar case, when p < N and m > 1, we do not have a priori Hölder continuity of the local minimizer.…”
Section: U0 Be As In (31) and Let F Be A Continuous Function Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we prove Theorem 1.2. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 in [3], where the scalar case m = 1 is considered. However, differently from the scalar case, when p < N and m > 1, we do not have a priori Hölder continuity of the local minimizer.…”
Section: U0 Be As In (31) and Let F Be A Continuous Function Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Hölder continuity of local minimizers of vectorial integral functionals 273 [3] is an up to the boundary higher integrability result for scalar-valued local minimizers. With obvious changes, the proof holds for vectorvalued Q-minimizers, too.…”
Section: Vol 10 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first step we assume that f (·, ξ) ∈ C 2 but we are able to establish the estimates (1.6) and (1.9) independently of the C 2 norm of the integrand f , by adopting an argument first used in [14]. In the second step we remove the assumption f (·, ξ) ∈ C 2 using an approximation procedure introduced in [14] and developed in [7,10,15]. More precisely we approximate f by a sequence {f h } of C 2 functions which are strictly elliptic (and the ellipticity constant is precisely the ν appearing in (H2)).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need now the following fundamental result that can be obtained with a procedure first introduced in [14,15] and then developed in [7,10], that plays a key role in the completion of the proof of our theorems. …”
Section: The Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%