Holding on Tight: Relationship Between Grip Strength and Marksmanship Stability

Christopher, John J.; Schindler, Jessica; Villa, Jose; Hussey, Erika; Ramsay, John W.; Brown, Stephanie

doi:10.1177/1071181319631104

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Handgrip dynamometry is established as a valid and reliable measure of individual grip strength and is highly correlated with overall strength and power in athletic and nonathletic populations [29,31,32]. In military populations, grip strength is of unique importance for military speci c tasks such as stabilizing and ring a weapon, hand to hand combat, negotiating obstacles, rope climbing and rappelling [33,34,35].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying relationships between compression garments and recovery in a military training environment

Saxon

Boberg

Faulk

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development and maintenance of physical capabilities is an essential part of combat readiness in the military. This readiness requires continuous training and is therefore compromised by injury. Because Service Members (SMs) must be physically and cognitively prepared to conduct multifaceted operations in support of strategic objectives, and because the Department of Defense’s (DoD) non-deployable rate and annual costs associated with treating SMs continue to rise at an alarming rate, finding a far-reaching and efficient solution to prevent such injuries is a high priority. Compression garments (CGs) have become increasingly popular over the past decade in human performance applications, and reportedly facilitate post-exercise recovery by reducing muscle soreness, increasing blood lactate removal, and increasing perception of recovery, but the evidence is mixed, at best. In the current study we explored whether CG use, and duration of use, improves recovery and mitigates muscle soreness effectively in an elite Marine training course. In order to test this, we subjected Service Members to fatiguing exercise and then measured subjective and objective recovery and soreness using participant reports and grip and leg strength over a 72-hour recovery period. Findings from this study suggest that wearing CGs for post training recovery showed significant and moderate positive effects on subjective soreness, fatigue, and perceived level of recovery. We did not find statistically significant effects on physical performance while testing grip or leg strength. These findings suggest that CG may be a beneficial strategy for military training environments to accelerate muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise, without adverse effects to the wearer or negative impact on military training.

show abstract