2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0807-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hole-doping of mechanically exfoliated graphene by confined hydration layers

Abstract: By the use of non-contact atomic force microscopy (NC-AFM) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), we measure the local surface potential of mechanically exfoliated graphene on the prototypical insulating hydrophilic substrate of CaF 2 (111). Hydration layers confined between the graphene and the CaF 2 substrate, resulting from the graphene's preparation under ambient conditions on the hydrophilic substrate surface, are found to electronically modify the graphene as the material's electron density transfers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immediately above the K + ions, graphene is significantly less conductive than over ion-free locations. This result indicates charge transfer from the underlying surface to graphene and is in good agreement with previous studies 15 25 26 27 . Our results shed light on the local distribution of ions on air-cleaved mica and pave the way for controlling the local electronic landscape of graphene.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Immediately above the K + ions, graphene is significantly less conductive than over ion-free locations. This result indicates charge transfer from the underlying surface to graphene and is in good agreement with previous studies 15 25 26 27 . Our results shed light on the local distribution of ions on air-cleaved mica and pave the way for controlling the local electronic landscape of graphene.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The formation of a fourth water layer was never observed. 33 The fact that we have never observed a fourth water layer indicates that it is energetically unfavorable. This may be a result of dangling OH bonds on the surface of the third layer, induced by the hydrophobicity of graphene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(d) The relation of free charge carrier density and surface potential difference of graphene with increasing number of confined water layers. Reproduced with permission of Springer from [98].…”
Section: Effects Of Water On the Local Electronic Properties Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%