2014
DOI: 10.2204/iodp.proc.345.110.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hole U1415AJ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean inclination of this component is 49.9° (k = 28.2; α 95 = 6.8°; n = 17), calculated using the Arason and Levi (2010) maximum likelihood method. The origin of these components is discussed fully in "Paleomagnetism" in the "Hole U1415J" chapter (Gillis et al, 2014d), in which more extensive data are used to demonstrate that this downward-directed remanence is related to the drilling-induced magnetization in these cores.…”
Section: Continuous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean inclination of this component is 49.9° (k = 28.2; α 95 = 6.8°; n = 17), calculated using the Arason and Levi (2010) maximum likelihood method. The origin of these components is discussed fully in "Paleomagnetism" in the "Hole U1415J" chapter (Gillis et al, 2014d), in which more extensive data are used to demonstrate that this downward-directed remanence is related to the drilling-induced magnetization in these cores.…”
Section: Continuous Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the strongest southward-dipping reflectors (Traces 2800-3400 in Fig. F7A) appears to intersect Hole U1415J somewhere between 60 and 100 meters below seafloor, which might be related to the cataclasites and fractured formation conditions we observed in the bottom of the hole (see the "Hole U1415J" chapter [Gillis et al, 2014b). These conditions led to the eventual abandonment of the hole.…”
Section: Preliminary Observationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The shorter needle (new during Expedition 345) allows measurements parallel or perpendicular to the trace of the foliation when visible on the cut face and was used for a few apparent anisotropy test measurements. The stability of the measurement series using the short needle (reported in the "Hole U1415I" and "Hole U1415J" chapters [Gillis et al, 2014b[Gillis et al, , 2014c) was not good enough to give reliable apparent anisotropy values. The quality of measurements done with the large needle probe was assessed using LET and N (number of solutions); only a few measured values were rejected.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 93%