2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory

Abstract: After decades of neglect philosophers of physics have discovered gauge theories-arguably the paradigm of modern field physics-as a genuine topic for foundational and philosophical research. Incidentally, in the last couple of years interest from the philosophy of physics in structural realism-in the eyes of its proponents the best suited realist position towards modern physics-has also raised. This paper tries to connect both topics and aims to show that structural realism gains further credence from an ontolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 See also (Castellani 1998) and (French 2000). (Kantorovich 2003;Lyre 2004) argue in analogous fashion that in gauge quantum field theories objects are secondary to structure because symmetries are fundamental in the constitution of fields. In general, OSRists interpret the mathematical nature of physical theory and the fact that all physical properties must be "extracted" somehow from symmetries and invariants that can be traced in the formalism of the theory as clear signs that the things described by the theory and their properties are themselves reducible to the relations that define such symmetries and invariants.…”
Section: The Argument From the Primacy Of Relationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…13 See also (Castellani 1998) and (French 2000). (Kantorovich 2003;Lyre 2004) argue in analogous fashion that in gauge quantum field theories objects are secondary to structure because symmetries are fundamental in the constitution of fields. In general, OSRists interpret the mathematical nature of physical theory and the fact that all physical properties must be "extracted" somehow from symmetries and invariants that can be traced in the formalism of the theory as clear signs that the things described by the theory and their properties are themselves reducible to the relations that define such symmetries and invariants.…”
Section: The Argument From the Primacy Of Relationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nicholas Teh (2015) has recently argued that according to this criterion there exist interesting analogies to the Galileo ship scenario in the gauge theories that underlie modern elementary particle physics. He takes his analysis to partly vindicates an earlier claim by Greaves and Wallace according to which some of the "local" gauge symmetries in gauge theories have direct empirical significance (Greaves and Wallace 2014), contrary to the claims made by other philosophers (Kosso 2000, Redhead 2002, Brading and Brown 2004, Lyre 2004, Healey 2009). Greaves and Wallace argue that the local gauge symmetries with direct empirical significance are those that do not reduce to the identity transformation on the subsystem boundary.…”
Section: Symmetries and Physical Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healey 2007, chap. 4.5;Lyre 2004b;Maudlin 2007, chap. 2 If, after all that, it still teaches nonlocality, I shall submit willingly to the best of authority."…”
Section: Subvenient Holistic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%