Philosophical Issues in Nursing 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-14235-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holism in nursing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All health professional education programmes are underpinned by strong ideals and values (UKCC 1986; CSP 2002; GMC 2005). In nursing, a philosophy of individualised, holistic care is explicit (Woods 1998). In the UK a nurse is expected to be a ‘knowledgeable doer’, with practice underpinned by research, and who is ethically responsible and accountable, and able to give individualised holistic care through caring and therapeutic interventions with patients and clients (UKCC 1986, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All health professional education programmes are underpinned by strong ideals and values (UKCC 1986; CSP 2002; GMC 2005). In nursing, a philosophy of individualised, holistic care is explicit (Woods 1998). In the UK a nurse is expected to be a ‘knowledgeable doer’, with practice underpinned by research, and who is ethically responsible and accountable, and able to give individualised holistic care through caring and therapeutic interventions with patients and clients (UKCC 1986, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By attempting to focus on clarity, our efforts yield greater polarization and greater bifurcation. Woods' (1998) approach, highlighting another dilemma inherent in language, is to theorize two definitions of holism, a weak and strong one, suggesting that the former might provide greater clarity by paradoxically softening the position and description. When caught up in this conceptual windstorm and invested in particular conceptualizations, we risk losing the more critical edge, as the debris of the arguments obscures the larger landscape.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%