2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44164-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic and featural processing’s link to face recognition varies by individual and task

Bryan Qi Zheng Leong,
Alejandro J. Estudillo,
Ahamed Miflah Hussain Ismail

Abstract: While it is generally accepted that holistic processing facilitates face recognition, recent studies suggest that poor recognition might also arise from imprecise perception of local features in the face. This study aimed to examine to what extent holistic and featural processing relates to individual differences in face recognition ability (FRA), during face learning (Experiment 1) and face recognition (Experiment 2). Participants performed two tasks: (1) The “Cambridge Face Memory Test-Chinese” which measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If our results generalise to these more naturalistic task demands, we might expect flexibility in the facial features sampled by an individual viewer to facilitate their discovery of diagnostic features as faces become familiar. Overall, it is possible that different task conditions might contribute additional variance in the features that are used in face identity processing (Leong et al, 2023; see also Smith & Merlusca, 2014). Future work should test flexibility in feature use across more diverse and naturalistic task demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If our results generalise to these more naturalistic task demands, we might expect flexibility in the facial features sampled by an individual viewer to facilitate their discovery of diagnostic features as faces become familiar. Overall, it is possible that different task conditions might contribute additional variance in the features that are used in face identity processing (Leong et al, 2023; see also Smith & Merlusca, 2014). Future work should test flexibility in feature use across more diverse and naturalistic task demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final 10 models (6 Caucasian and 4 Eastern/Southeastern Asian) were average on all ratings 1 . We combined Eastern/Southeastern Asian faces into a broad ‘Asian’ category, as previous face recognition research has treated them as a single category [ 62 , 63 ], as do some face databases (e.g., Chicago Face Database) [ 64 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%