2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp04986j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic approach to chemical degradation of Nafion membranes in fuel cells: modelling and predictions

Abstract: We present a model and web-based tool for rapid and efficient prediction and rationalization of chemical membrane degradation in PEMFCs including protection mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
57
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
3
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The full model (FM) of the chemical degradation of PEM, recently published by Frühwirt et al [4], comprising 23 reactions between 23 chemical species, is listed in Table 1. The model can roughly be separated into three submodels (divided by horizontal lines in Table 1), describing three distinct processes, leading to the chemical degradation of the perfluorinated membrane.…”
Section: Degradation Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The full model (FM) of the chemical degradation of PEM, recently published by Frühwirt et al [4], comprising 23 reactions between 23 chemical species, is listed in Table 1. The model can roughly be separated into three submodels (divided by horizontal lines in Table 1), describing three distinct processes, leading to the chemical degradation of the perfluorinated membrane.…”
Section: Degradation Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1. Overview of the model [4] obtained by mathematical simplification procedures. The rate constants k = A exp (−E a /RT) are given in L mol −1 s −1 and at temperature T = 298.15 K, activation energies E a in kJ mol −1 and the pre-exponential factors A in L mol −1 s −1 .…”
Section: Degradation Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite significant development in recent years, the degradation of fuel cell components remains the main limiting factor in a wider adoption of this technology. Several degradation mechanisms, deteriorating the performance of crucial fuel cell components, are shared between the LT and the HT-PEMFCs, most notable among them being the degradation of the proton conducting membrane [4] and the catalyst layer [5]. While the membrane degradation mechanisms differ significantly between LT-and HT-PEMFC because of the difference in the membrane materials used [3], the characteristics of the catalyst layer, and consequently the relevant degradation mechanisms, -Paper presented at the 23rd EFCF Conference ''Low-Temperature Fuel Cells, Electrolyzers, H2-Processing Forum'' (EFCF2019), 2-5 July 2019 held in Lucerne, Switzerland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%