2023
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic integration of omics data reveals the drivers that shape the ecology of microbial meat spoilage scenarios

Simon Poirier,
Gwendoline Coeuret,
Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundThe use of omics data for monitoring the microbial flow of fresh meat products along a production line and the development of spoilage prediction tools from these data is a promising but challenging task. In this context, we produced a large multivariate dataset (over 600 samples) obtained on the production lines of two similar types of fresh meat products (poultry and raw pork sausages). We describe a full analysis of this dataset in order to decipher how the spoilage microbial ecology of these two … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, these compounds impart buttery or metallic flavors and are often associated with undesirable sensory characteristics in spoiled meats 58 . The production of lactate, acetate, and ethanol indicates metabolic activities and also leads to changes in pH, acidity, and alcohol content 59 . These alterations affect the sensory attributes and quality, all potentially leading to spoilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, these compounds impart buttery or metallic flavors and are often associated with undesirable sensory characteristics in spoiled meats 58 . The production of lactate, acetate, and ethanol indicates metabolic activities and also leads to changes in pH, acidity, and alcohol content 59 . These alterations affect the sensory attributes and quality, all potentially leading to spoilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%