Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Among others factors, the triggers for sanding include: drilling, cementing, and completion operations; stress and pressure conditions; formation strength and weakening; and cyclic processes. Any single factor may suffice to initiate sand production. Hence, comprehending sanding entails examining various physical mechanisms concerning the interaction between fluids and rocks under reservoir conditions. This article presents an innovative study focused on evaluating and understanding the effect on sanding for the following components: vertical to hotizontal stress anisotropy, stresses around the hole, and formation strength and weakening. It combines three points in the analysis: (1) The 3D printing technology, which allows obtaining similar samples with high repeatability, giving reliability to the results; (2) A comprehensive program for the mechanical characterization of printed samples; and, (3) The study of the mechanical behavior of the samples under sanding conditions. The testing program includes uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial stress test, thick-walled cylinder and big hollow cylinder test with Sanding (BHCT) tests, which aims to show the relationship between the mechanical behavior, the test conditions, and the sand production level. The sample’s characterization reveals a high porosity, the presence of bedding planes, and similar Young’s modulus and UCS strength. For the BHCT tests, a novel equipment is introduced. This equipment uses large samples and enables: an independent control of axial stress, radial stress, pore pressure, and flow rate; and measurement of produced sand. The results show higher levels of sanding when the axial stress is low compared to the radial external stress.
Among others factors, the triggers for sanding include: drilling, cementing, and completion operations; stress and pressure conditions; formation strength and weakening; and cyclic processes. Any single factor may suffice to initiate sand production. Hence, comprehending sanding entails examining various physical mechanisms concerning the interaction between fluids and rocks under reservoir conditions. This article presents an innovative study focused on evaluating and understanding the effect on sanding for the following components: vertical to hotizontal stress anisotropy, stresses around the hole, and formation strength and weakening. It combines three points in the analysis: (1) The 3D printing technology, which allows obtaining similar samples with high repeatability, giving reliability to the results; (2) A comprehensive program for the mechanical characterization of printed samples; and, (3) The study of the mechanical behavior of the samples under sanding conditions. The testing program includes uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial stress test, thick-walled cylinder and big hollow cylinder test with Sanding (BHCT) tests, which aims to show the relationship between the mechanical behavior, the test conditions, and the sand production level. The sample’s characterization reveals a high porosity, the presence of bedding planes, and similar Young’s modulus and UCS strength. For the BHCT tests, a novel equipment is introduced. This equipment uses large samples and enables: an independent control of axial stress, radial stress, pore pressure, and flow rate; and measurement of produced sand. The results show higher levels of sanding when the axial stress is low compared to the radial external stress.
With the advent of advancement in hydrocyclones in oil industry, there has been various types of hydrocyclone based desanding system developed each with its own pros and cons. Main challenges being the handling of multiphase fluid resulting in four phases of feed and challenges in designing. Operators had been facing various challenges in sand management since a decade which has resulted in installation of various hydrocyclone based desanders. Many of the hydrocyclone based desanders did not perform as per expectation and mixed results were observed. With more sand handling issues expected in future, a study was conducted to ascertain lessons learnt and challenges in past installations and way forward for future. A focussed team which includes production technologists and process specialists was established. The team compiled the installation histories of earlier installations and challenges. These included design, operational and logistic details for any installation. Approximately 15 different desander technologies currently prevalent in market and within the region were evaluated to understand the mechanism and variety of each type. The cyclone system was categorized into fixed, changeable with insert and dynamic cyclonic desander for ease of evaluation. The learnings from the earlier installations indicated significance of category which needs to be considered for an installation. Parameters like pressure drop across the cyclone, inlet pressure at the cyclone system, particle size separation, gas volume fraction at the feed volume of sand being produced, sand handling capability of the facility etc. turned out as significant contributors for selection of desanders. Operator's conditions of high gas volumes, relatively finer particles being produced and low pressure environment turned out to be biggest technical challenges in selection of a proper desander. Other challenges included importance of a multi-disciplinary team, contracting strategy and type of desander to be deployed. It was apparent from the study that any future installation would require more systematic approach rather than "pick up from shelf" approach on the desanders. A unique selection flowchart was established as a guideline for selection of hydrocyclone desanders on the basis of major parameters to decide not only on the type of desander required but also the location of desander in a facility. The new by defined category eased out this entire process. To avoid any failure for future selection and installation, a well-defined contracting strategy was established to encompass various types of desanders easing the selection process and utilizing the study results. This entire effort resulted in huge potential value creation and promised a significant saving in man hours.
Since 1984, Peninsular Malaysia's gas fields have followed a distinct operational philosophy. In the initial field development, sand production was not considered a concern, resulting in wells and facilities without designs for sand management. Consequently, wells are confined to their maximum sand-free rate. Conversely, with reservoir pressure depletion, wells are beaned up to enhance drawdown, inadvertently introducing sand into the wellbore. This necessitates a delicate balance between sustaining production and managing sand effectively. This paper delves into how a highly sand-sensitive asset in Peninsular Malaysia's gas field navigates this challenge through the adoption of risk-based approach to sand management. The adoption of PETRONAS Carigali management guideline, aims to transition assets to a risk-based strategy, avoiding well shut-ins upon surface sand detection. Sand severity matrix was mapped as the initial analysis to assess sand erosion and transportation risks. Addressing sand issues starts with downhole management in wells lacking primary control. Remedial measures such as through tubing erosion-resistant sand screens, are installed. Following installations, monitoring enhancements involve acoustic sand sensors and online sampling, facilitate swift responses to sand surges, especially in satellite platforms. Acknowledging that sand controls may not entirely filter sand downhole; fines are managed through a closed loop online sampling. To identify flowline defects from sand erosion, radiographic and ultrasonic testing, especially at hotspots, is employed. Notably, routine pigging ensures a comprehensive approach to sand management within the platform. Field A led the way as the initial field in Peninsular Malaysia to pilot the adoption. With downhole sand control in wells producing sand, along with acoustic sensors and an online sand sampler, Field A saw 30% production increment, matching peak production in 2019. Despite success, one well continued producing fines below 45 microns. Sand erosion analysis tool indicated minimal erosional rate within limits, further confirming with ultrasonic and radiographic testing, UT/RT done previously, allowing the well to flow with risk assessment. This served as a pivotal milestone, where wells were previously restricted even with insignificant sand presence. Post-sand screen installations, pigging operations showed minimal sand accumulation in pipelines. Planned UT/RT inspections at each flowline will provide further insights. In mature fields, the occurrence of sand production becomes inevitable. By incorporating downhole sand control, real-time sensors, online sand sampling, continuous flowline integrity monitoring, and regular pigging, operators can proactively manage sand production in the long run. This strategy enables the optimization of production while mitigating the risk of equipment damage or operational disruptions stemming from sand-related challenges. A field that, for the past decade, maintained zero tolerance for sand is now transitioning to an acceptable level of sand production. Addressing sand management solely downhole is insufficient; comprehensive measures on the surface are required, fostering accountability across all parties to facilitate the transformation of a sand-sensitive asset.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.