2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2951947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hollowing Out the State: Franchise Expansion and Fiscal Capacity in Colonial India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Take, for instance, the case of colonial India where an episode of limited franchise expansion in 1920 was associated with greater tax avoidance and lower tax collections. Suryanarayan (2016) finds that greater social inequality between castes was associated with greater tax noncompliance and a decline in the size of the district bureaucracy a decade later. She argues that franchise expansion threatened the social dominance of upper castes, who controlled vast aspects of the British bureaucracy and who sought to protect their control of education, drinking-water wells, sanitation, and temples from lower castes.…”
Section: Taxation Bureaucratic Capacity and Social Statusmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Take, for instance, the case of colonial India where an episode of limited franchise expansion in 1920 was associated with greater tax avoidance and lower tax collections. Suryanarayan (2016) finds that greater social inequality between castes was associated with greater tax noncompliance and a decline in the size of the district bureaucracy a decade later. She argues that franchise expansion threatened the social dominance of upper castes, who controlled vast aspects of the British bureaucracy and who sought to protect their control of education, drinking-water wells, sanitation, and temples from lower castes.…”
Section: Taxation Bureaucratic Capacity and Social Statusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, empirical studies of many parts of the world have not found a growth in taxation following franchise expansion (Acemoglu et al 2015;Perotti 1996). Recent research has argued that incumbent elites, facing the prospect of losing power, can "hollow out" the state's bureaucratic machinery (Suryanarayan 2016). While scholars studying variation in spending and taxation across democracies have emphasized factors that shape fiscal policy (Alesina and Glaeser 2004;Iversen and Soskice 2006;Lee and Roemer 2006;Stasavage 2006a, 2006b), this new research has emphasized how elites can target both levels of taxation and the bureaucratic capacity essential for taxation and redistribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The colonial period contained neither of these extremes but was characterized by moderate shifts in literacy, from 4.5% in 1891 to 8% in 1931 (including Burma). The rise in literacy was inhibited by colonial underinvestment in education, itself a product of the suspicion of both British and Indian elites towards an educated populace (Chaudhary 2009; Suryanarayan 2014). Colonial educational policy consequently favored English over the vernacular, and high education over primary education (Seth 2007; Chaudhary 2009).…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6The data were copied from books digitized using OCR. For further information about the 1931 data, see Suryanarayan (2016); for the 1971 data, see Bhavnani and Jensenius (2015). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%