2006
DOI: 10.1215/03335372-2005-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocaust Testimony, Ethics, and the Problem of Representation

Abstract: It has taken many decades after 1945 for the testimony of Holocaust victims to be taken seriously. This article charts the shift from the marginalization of survivors and the lack of interest in their accounts immediately after the war to more recent developments, whereby they have gained belated recognition and huge efforts have been made to record their experiences. Faced now with the largest collection of testimony ever gathered about one specific event in history, historians and others representing the pas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…during the 1990s, Steven Spielberg's Shoah Visual History Foundation recorded over 54,000 Jewish testimonies of the Holocaust (Kushner, 2006). the existence of this immense collection is widely known, but the interviews held in california are difficult to access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…during the 1990s, Steven Spielberg's Shoah Visual History Foundation recorded over 54,000 Jewish testimonies of the Holocaust (Kushner, 2006). the existence of this immense collection is widely known, but the interviews held in california are difficult to access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of survivors' recorded, written and/or published accounts had led to very high standards of processing the material, especially after the "ethical turn" in the 1990s (Glowacka 2012: 4-5). Today, the standards involve above all respect for the communicated meaning, irrespective of its sometimes hobbled form (Felman, Laub 1992; see also Kushner 2006) and attention paid to the smallest detail not only at the factual level, but also as regards the articulation: fluency of sentence structure, vocal emission, gesticulation and body language (Kidron 2009). The ethical requirement is combined with a non-reductive approach to the material and with multi-level analysis using diverse tools.…”
Section: Testimony In Its Proper Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst historians (Roth 2005;Kushner 2006), artists (Lang 2000), psychologists (Raalte et al 2007;Kellerman 2001), and educationalists (Short and Reid 2004;Davies 2000) have formulated approaches that balance these considerations, given the longevity of research in these areas, similar practices for the study of the archaeological remains of this period have not yet been established. In the past, some archaeological projects have faced criticism for failing to account for the beliefs of affected groups and this has undoubtedly impacted upon the number of subsequent projects undertaken (Weiss 2003;Gross 2004).…”
Section: Contextualising Archaeological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%