2010
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene changes in the position and intensity of the southern westerly wind belt

Abstract: The position and intensity of the southern westerly wind belt varies seasonally as a consequence of changes in sea surface temperature. During the austral winter, the belt expands northward and the wind intensity in the core decreases. Conversely, during the summer, the belt contracts, and the intensity within the core is strengthened. Reconstructions of the westerly winds since the last glacial maximum, however, have suggested that changes at a single site reflected shifts throughout the entire southern wind … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

38
356
3
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
38
356
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that the archipelago is situated in the core of the SHW today we suggest that the SHW shifted south of Kerguelen Islands during Northern Hemisphere cold events (HS1 and YD) and shifted equator-ward during the ACR-OCR. Following Lamy et al (2010), Kerguelen Islands should be less influenced by the SHW during the ACR-OCR as the belt was more expanded (Austral winter today), than during the warm SH events during HS1 and YD, which contradicts our results. However, the difference between summer and winter conditions of the wind belt is much less pronounced in the Indian Ocean than in South America and we want to stress that the hypothesis was brought forward based on Holocene records and has not been tested for the Last Termination.…”
Section: The Kerguelen Islands Data Set In a Larger Shw Contextcontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account that the archipelago is situated in the core of the SHW today we suggest that the SHW shifted south of Kerguelen Islands during Northern Hemisphere cold events (HS1 and YD) and shifted equator-ward during the ACR-OCR. Following Lamy et al (2010), Kerguelen Islands should be less influenced by the SHW during the ACR-OCR as the belt was more expanded (Austral winter today), than during the warm SH events during HS1 and YD, which contradicts our results. However, the difference between summer and winter conditions of the wind belt is much less pronounced in the Indian Ocean than in South America and we want to stress that the hypothesis was brought forward based on Holocene records and has not been tested for the Last Termination.…”
Section: The Kerguelen Islands Data Set In a Larger Shw Contextcontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…An alternative hypothesis of SHW changes was brought forward by Lamy et al (2010) for Holocene records of South America but the mechanism may also apply to the Last Termination (Kilian and Lamy, 2012). It was proposed, due to opposing precipitation records from the core and the northern boundary of the SHW, that the SHW belt did not shift latitudinally as a whole but rather that the wind belt expanded during colder periods (as observed during Austral winter today) and became more confined during warmer conditions (Austral summer).…”
Section: The Kerguelen Islands Data Set In a Larger Shw Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1) at 9.6 ka 16 and increased influence of glacial melt and precipitation in Maxwell Bay 13 . This warmth was concomitant with the last influence of orbitally-forced deglaciation 5,15 and ENSO-sensitive proxy records from the Peru margin and Ecuador 5,17 that indicate a persistent warm, mean La Niña-like state (relative to mean El Niño-like conditions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…S1). Increased upwelling of upper Circumpolar Deepwater (UCDW) onto the continental shelf at this time 14 associated with strong winds in the southern region of the Southern Hemisphere westerlies 15 (Fig. 1g) would have supplied additional warmth to the upper water column making frontal melting the dominant mechanism driving glacial discharge/δ 18 O diatom .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%