1988
DOI: 10.1016/0277-3791(88)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene glacier fluctuations in South America and Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
1
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
92
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As ice-shelves have started to retreat now can we interpret the patterns of colonisation with a view to explaining how recolonisation may have happened in the past? When ice-shelves expanded and bulldozed shallow faunas to the shelfedges (Clapperton and Sugden, 1988), were their refuge shelf areas that were not covered and can we link these periods in time to extinctions and subsequent radiations? Are larvae and/or adults crossing the Polar Frontal Zone regularly and are they doing so naturally or aided by man?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ice-shelves have started to retreat now can we interpret the patterns of colonisation with a view to explaining how recolonisation may have happened in the past? When ice-shelves expanded and bulldozed shallow faunas to the shelfedges (Clapperton and Sugden, 1988), were their refuge shelf areas that were not covered and can we link these periods in time to extinctions and subsequent radiations? Are larvae and/or adults crossing the Polar Frontal Zone regularly and are they doing so naturally or aided by man?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2400-2200 yr BP, indicating that it corresponds to the second Neoglaciation. Aniya (1995) also dated the Pearson I moraine with 14 C to be 1600-900 yr BP, which corresponds to the third Neoglaciation that was supposed by Clapperton and Sugden (1988), instead of long-believed ca. 2300 yr BP proposed by Mercer (1965).…”
Section: Mercer's Schemementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Heusser (1960) dated sediments in a pond developed on the Témpanos I moraine to be 3610 ± 400 year before present (yr BP) and inferred the advance of Glaciar San Rafael at around 5000-4000 yr BP by considering the time required for sediment accumulation. However, although Muller (1959) provided no date, he considered the Témpanos I moraine to be of Lateglacial in age, a view of which was supported by Clapperton and Sugden (1988). In his book, Heusser (2003) argued for the Holocene, though, saying that their reasons to dismiss the possibility of the late Holocene in age are not compelling (p. 36).…”
Section: Hielo Patagónicomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations