2014
DOI: 10.1785/0120140029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holocene Paleoearthquakes and Early–Late Pleistocene Slip Rate on the Sulmona Fault (Central Apeninnes, Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, return times for M w 7.0 earthquakes on the CF are irregularly spaced, ranging from~1.4 kyr (between 1783 and the Roman event) to~4.4 kyr, with an average value in the Holocene of~3.2 kyr. This is a long recurrence time for southern Apennine faults, where large surface rupturing earthquakes are usually spaced a few centuries apart (0.3-1.6 kyr) [Galli and Peronace, 2014], or less than a couple of millennia apart [Galli et al, 2008[Galli et al, , 2011, except for those on central Apennine dormant faults (~2.4 kyr) [Galli et al, 2015]. Nevertheless, this return time is consistent with the low slip rate of the fault (0.6 mm/yr) in the past 28 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, return times for M w 7.0 earthquakes on the CF are irregularly spaced, ranging from~1.4 kyr (between 1783 and the Roman event) to~4.4 kyr, with an average value in the Holocene of~3.2 kyr. This is a long recurrence time for southern Apennine faults, where large surface rupturing earthquakes are usually spaced a few centuries apart (0.3-1.6 kyr) [Galli and Peronace, 2014], or less than a couple of millennia apart [Galli et al, 2008[Galli et al, , 2011, except for those on central Apennine dormant faults (~2.4 kyr) [Galli et al, 2015]. Nevertheless, this return time is consistent with the low slip rate of the fault (0.6 mm/yr) in the past 28 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No large-magnitude historical seismic events can be strictly related to these structures which, however, show evidence of late Pleistocene-Holocene activity (Barchi et al, 2000;Galadini and Galli, 2000;Papanikolaou et al, 2005, and references therein). Only recently has the 2nd century AD earthquake that occurred in central Italy been associated with the Sulmona fault system through archaeoseismological and paleoseismological evidence (Ceccaroni et al, 2009;Galli et al, 2015). This lack of data could be due to long recurrence intervals (1400-2600 years; Galadini and Galli, 2000) and/or to the incompleteness of the available historical seismic catalogues (e.g., Stucchi et al, 2004), suggesting high seismic hazard levels and raising critical questions about the identification of the seismogenic structures and the true seismic potential of these areas.…”
Section: Geological and Structural Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most hazardous adjacent seismogenic structures are the Sulmona normal fault (or Mt. Morrone fault) capable of producing M = 6.6-6.7 earthquakes (e.g., Vittori et al, 1995;Galadini and Galli, 2000;Gori et al, 2011Gori et al, , 2014Galli et al, 2015), the RotellaAremogna normal fault system and the Palena-western Porrara normal fault system (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Geological and Structural Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations