2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-019-02320-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holomorphic Jacobi manifolds and holomorphic contact groupoids

Abstract: This paper belongs to a series of works aiming at exploring generalized (complex) geometry in odd dimensions. Holomorphic Jacobi manifolds were introduced and studied by the authors in a separate paper as special cases of generalized contact bundles. In fact, generalized contact bundles are nothing but odd dimensional analogues of generalized complex manifolds. In the present paper, we solve the integration problem for holomorphic Jacobi manifolds by proving that they integrate to holomorphic contact groupoids… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where "objects" refers to the basic building blocks -functions, vector fields, differential forms, etc. Let us explain this in slightly more detail (and we refer the reader to Section 2 of [11] for further details). The role that functions on M have in usual geometry is played by sections of L ("Atiyah functions").…”
Section: Objects On Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where "objects" refers to the basic building blocks -functions, vector fields, differential forms, etc. Let us explain this in slightly more detail (and we refer the reader to Section 2 of [11] for further details). The role that functions on M have in usual geometry is played by sections of L ("Atiyah functions").…”
Section: Objects On Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for a (1, 1)-tensor K : T M → T M, we denote by K † : T M → T M its -adjoint (1, 1)tensor. Then, from(X , Y )u = I(G(∇ |L | X , ∇ |L | Y )) = G(∇ D I ∇ |L | X , ∇ |L | Y ) + G(∇ |L | X , ∇ D I ∇ |L | Y ) 0 = ∇ |L | X (G(I, ∇ |L | Y )) = G(∇ D A † )(X ) = (B + B † )(X ) = X , (A − A † )(X ) = (B − B † )(X ) = (i X dη) ♯ ,(6 11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contact manifold (M, η) has naturally associated with it, a Jacobi structure [74,75] which can be defined by a bilinear map, {., .} :…”
Section: Lagrange Bracketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, such line bundles are intrinsic models for so called normal almost contact manifolds [7]. In our opinion, generalized contact bundles have an advantage over previous proposals of a generalized contact geometry: they have a firm conceptual basis in the so called homogenization scheme [40], which is, in essence, a dictionary from contact and related geometries to symplectic and related geometries. In principle, applying the dictionary is straightforward: it is enough to replace functions on a manifold M with sections of a line bundle L → M , vector fields over M with derivations of L, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In principle, applying the dictionary is straightforward: it is enough to replace functions on a manifold M with sections of a line bundle L → M , vector fields over M with derivations of L, etc. In practice, applying the dictionary can be actually challenging, and may lead to interesting new features [19,36,37,24,25,9,34,33,39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%