2023
DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.202105_013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holomorphicity of real Kaehler submanifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof: Proposition 7 in [2] gives (29). The remaining of the statement is Proposition 2.6 in [4] as well as Lemma 7 in [14].…”
Section: The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proof: Proposition 7 in [2] gives (29). The remaining of the statement is Proposition 2.6 in [4] as well as Lemma 7 in [14].…”
Section: The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus J N is constant along the fibers of Λ. Then J N is parallel with respect to the Levi-Civita connection ∇ on N 2n+2ℓ since by (3) we have that…”
Section: ) Lambdamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, if the codimension is even then f , when restricted to any open subset of M 2n , is not allowed to be holomorphic in R 2n+2q ∼ = C n+q . Notice that conditions that yield f to be holomorphic have been given in [3] and are just minimal in [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: For p ≤ 5 the proof of Proposition 10 in [1], where the inner product on U p is positive definite and α satisfies a certain condition, can be adapted to this case. With the notations in there and using the same type of arguments used there it is easy to conclude that the only cases one needs to consider are 2 ≤ κ < τ ≤ p − 1 where κ and τ are even.…”
Section: Flat Bilinear Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot have B Y j (N) = U(X), j = 1, 2, since otherwise dim U(Y j ) ≤ 3 < τ . Therefore, by Fact 12 in [1] it remains to consider the case dim…”
Section: Flat Bilinear Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%