European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities 2006
DOI: 10.1057/9780230626447_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home and ‘Work’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather this may involve views such as that a man who uses violence against his wife is not in command. Condemnation of violence might sometimes be ways to revalorize other or dominant forms of men/masculinity, such as the ‘superiority’ of non-violent or less obviously violent men/masculinity (Hearn et al ., 2006).…”
Section: The Hegemony Of Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather this may involve views such as that a man who uses violence against his wife is not in command. Condemnation of violence might sometimes be ways to revalorize other or dominant forms of men/masculinity, such as the ‘superiority’ of non-violent or less obviously violent men/masculinity (Hearn et al ., 2006).…”
Section: The Hegemony Of Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, promoters renegotiate availability and the recognition of fathers' parental roles but keep them aligned with organizations' interests. Challenging the availability demands of “greedy organizations” (Hearn et al., 2006; Kvande, 2009) comes with emphasizing the mutual benefits that come with organizational acceptance of fathers' care needs. The postfeminist connection of gender‐change projects with neo‐liberal discourses (Gill, 2007) becomes evident here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It rests on the assumption that committed employees always prioritize work, are unrestrictedly available for their employer, and have no care responsibilities or career interruptions. Availability demands even intensify in the context of neoliberalism and current knowledge work organizations, which become more and more “time hungry” (Hearn et al., 2006), “greedy”, and create boundless time cultures (Kvande, 2009). At the root of this traditional career norm is the ideological assumption (Martin, 1990, p. 343) of a clear separation between work and the private sphere.…”
Section: The Ideal Worker As Care‐free and Organizational Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%