1975
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-82-1-111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Care: Much Needed, Much Neglected

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Home care has become a viable and revived concept of medical care. The subject has recently been reviewed and discussed elsewhere (2)(3)(4)(5)(6), including differences of opinions concerning its merits (7)(8)(9)(10). Home care has recently received attention from government and other third-party payers (11)(12)(13)(14) and from many medical institutions and individuals (personal communications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home care has become a viable and revived concept of medical care. The subject has recently been reviewed and discussed elsewhere (2)(3)(4)(5)(6), including differences of opinions concerning its merits (7)(8)(9)(10). Home care has recently received attention from government and other third-party payers (11)(12)(13)(14) and from many medical institutions and individuals (personal communications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was accomplished with an annual budget of $35,000 in no small part due to the fact that the professional staff volunteered their time 3 . In an editorial accompanying this article, Somers and Bryant were prophetic when they wrote in reference to home care, “despite all the lip‐service, however, we are unlikely to witness any rapid overall expansion.” 4 They noted that home health services were actually declining under Part A of Medicare between 1969 and 1973, The reasons were judged to be that most physicians were not interested in either chronic illness or home care and that most hospital administrators were “primarily concerned with keeping their expensive beds filled.” There was clearly no incentive under a cost‐reimbursement payment system for a hospital to provide home care services. Furthermore the major third party payors influenced by the public's decision to preferentially provide bricks and mortar to the health care industry, as well as by the heady ambrosia associated with a sexy technology, paid little attention to services outside of the hospital.…”
Section: Home Medical Service 1984–1985: Partial Listing Of Communmentioning
confidence: 99%