“…The effect is stronger in regions with higher marketization and is weaker when investing in BRI countries Huang, Shen, and Zhang ( 2022 ) | Asia-Pacific Journal of Management | Institutional theory | Quantitative data; ordinary least squares regression | Home government support has a positive impact on the performance of SOEs’ subsidiaries. This effect is weaker in countries that are cooperating with the BRI than in those that are not |
Li, Van Assche, Li, and Qian ( 2022b ) | Journal of International Business Studies | Varieties of capitalism; Geopolitics | Conceptual | Institutions and geopolitics influence both the legitimacy gap of Chinese firms in a host country and the host country’s relative bargaining power, affecting the likelihood that host firms and third-country MNEs are selected in BRI projects |
Mukhtar, Zhu, Lee, Bambacas, and Cavusgil ( 2022 ) | International Business Review | Social networks | Qualitative interviews | Acculturation experience, cross-cultural networking, networking behavior, and factors influencing cross-cultural adjustment, enhance the overall performance of BRI projects |
Wang, Li, and Wei ( 2022 ) | Asia-Pacific Journal of Management | Resource-based theory | Quantitative data; panel data econometric model | R&D intensity is identified as a burden and political ties as support for corporations’ short-term performance in BRI projects |
Wang and Liu ( 2022 ) | Asia-Pacific Journal of Management | Institutional theory, outward FDI | Quantitative data; regression | State equity of Chinese firms pushes their proactiveness in investing in BRI countries |
Yang, Wang, Liu, and Huang ( 2022 ) | Asia-Pacific Journal of Management | Institutional theory | Quantitative data; difference-in-differences-method | BRI exerts a positive effect on corporate social responsibilities of Chinese MNEs involved in the BRI and the effect is stronger for Chinese state-owned MNEs |
Zhang, Huang, Duan, and Li ( 2022 ) | ...
…”