Home energy efficiency and radon related risk of lung cancer: modelling study

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of reducing home ventilation as part of household energy efficiency measures on deaths from radon related lung cancer.Design Modelling study. Setting England.Intervention Home energy efficiency interventions, motivated in part by targets for reducing greenhouse gases, which entail reduction in uncontrolled ventilation in keeping with good practice guidance.Main outcome measures Modelled current and future distributions of indoor radon levels for the English housing stock and associated changes in life years due to lung cancer mortality, estimated using life tables. ResultsIncreasing the air tightness of dwellings (without compensatory purpose-provided ventilation) increased mean indoor radon concentrations by an estimated 56.6%, from 21.2 becquerels per cubic metre (Bq/m 3 ) to 33.2 Bq/m 3 . After the lag in lung cancer onset, this would result in an additional annual burden of 4700 life years lost and (at peak) 278 deaths. The increases in radon levels for the millions of homes that would contribute most of the additional burden are below the threshold at which radon remediation measures are cost effective. Fitting extraction fans and trickle ventilators to restore ventilation will help offset the additional burden but only if the ventilation related energy efficiency gains are lost. Mechanical ventilation systems with heat recovery may lower radon levels and the risk of cancer while maintaining the advantage of energy efficiency for the most airtight dwellings but there is potential for a major adverse impact on health if such systems fail.Conclusion Unless specific remediation is used, reducing the ventilation of dwellings will improve energy efficiency only at the expense of population wide adverse impact on indoor exposure to radon and risk of lung cancer. The implications of this and other consequences of changes to ventilation need to be carefully evaluated to ensure that the desirable health and environmental benefits of home energy efficiency are not compromised by avoidable negative impacts on indoor air quality.

Understanding and mitigating overheating and indoor PM2.5 risks using coupled temperature and indoor air quality models

“…Furthermore, the building permeabilities were decreased by 5 m 3 /h/m 2 to reflect improvements to building airtightness following retrofits. 24 The future building envelope characteristics can be seen in Table 2. In multiple-occupancy buildings, dwellings were modelled at ground, middle and top-floor heights.…”

Indoor air quality in 24 California residences designed as high-performance homes

“…are implemented. Research efforts including both simulations and field measurements have demonstrated increased negative health effects or poor IAQ in efficient or retrofitted residences that did not sufficiently address IAQ provisions (Emmerich et al, 2005;Milner et al, 2014;Offermann, 2009;Wilson et al, 2013). Yet, other research efforts that have consistently included IAQ best practices have demonstrated improved health outcomes and generally reduced pollutant levels (Breysse et al, 2011;Jacobs, 2013;Kovesi et al, 2009;Leech et al, 2004;Noris et al, 2013a;Weichenthal et al, 2013).…”

Comprehensive survey of household radon gas levels and risk factors in southern Alberta

“…Indeed, increasing airtightness can elevate mean radon concentrations by 56.6%. 19 This effect makes radon a more pressing concern in countries with colder climates such as Canada. • Home floor-plan sizes in Alberta have steadily increased over time.…”