Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: The Finn-Home study

Niiranen, Teemu J.; Hänninen, Marjo-Riitta A.; Johansson, Jouni K.; Reunanen, Antti; Jula, Antti

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.041

Cited by 105 publications

(159 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

146

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…23 Prospective studies have shown that HBPM values were better correlated to cardiovascular and renal complications when compared to ambulatory measurements. [26][27][28][29][30][31] In conclusion, we observed that BP values obtained with the automated digital method have good agreement with those obtained with the conventional auscultatory method. The results indicate that HBPM with validated digital devices should be encouraged as a strategy to help with BP control and increase the treatment compliance of hypertensive patients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

Similaridade entre os valores da pressão arterial aferida pelo método auscultatório com aparelho de coluna de mercúrio e o método oscilométrico automático com aparelho digital

Pavan¹,

Saura²,

Korkes³

et al. 2012

J. Bras. Nefrol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 68%

Similaridade entre os valores da pressão arterial aferida pelo método auscultatório com aparelho de coluna de mercúrio e o método oscilométrico automático com aparelho digital

Pavan¹,

Saura²,

Korkes³

et al. 2012

J. Bras. Nefrol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…During a mean follow-up of 4 years, morning SBP was shown to improve the discrimination of incident stroke beyond traditional risk factors including office SBP; as such, the authors concluded that morning home SBP itself should be evaluated to ensure best stroke prediction in clinical practice. The Finn-Home study found that in more than 2000 randomly selected subjects followed for a mean of 6.8 years, home BP measurements was a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office BP measurements [23]. When both home and office BP measurements were included in predictive models, only home BP predicted cardiovascular events with an HR per 10/5 mm Hg increase of 1.22/1.15 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.37/1.05 to 1.26).…”

Section: Recommendationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expert panel consensus recommendations for home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: the Hope Asia Network

Park

Buranakitjaroen

Chen³

et al. 2018

J Hum Hypertens

146

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The high prognostic significance of home BP is considered to be derived from the stability of BP information. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Evidence has also shown that home BP reflects target organ damage with similar or higher reliability than ABP. [42][43][44][45][46] ABPM provides data on short-term BP variability every 15-30 min, and these values are reported to have prognostic significance.…”

Section: ) Home Bp and Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure at Home (Second Edition)

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONSince Riva-Rocci invented indirect brachial cuff sphygmomanometry in 1896 1 and Korotkoff proposed the auscultatory method in 1905, 2 the method for blood pressure (BP) measurements has remained essentially unchanged for the past 100 years.In 1969, Posey et al. 3 identified mean BP on the basis of the cuff-oscillometric method. With subsequent theoretical and technical improvements, the method to determine systolic and diastolic BP (S and D, respectively) was introduced to the cuff-oscillometric method. As a result, many of the automatic electronic sphygmomanometers available today have adopted this method, and those different from the auscultatory method have begun to be used in general clinical practice. Since the advent of indirect methods for sphygmomanometry, the past century has developed the practical and clinical sciences of hypertension. However, BP information necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension is still obtained essentially on the basis of casual measurements at the outpatient clinic (clinic BP). However, the reliability of clinic BP was called into question 40 years after the advent of indirect sphygmomanometry. In 1940, Ayman and Goldshine 4 widely adopted the concept of self-BP measurements in the field of clinic BP measurements and demonstrated discrepancies between clinic BP and self-BP measurements. Bevan, 5 in the United Kingdom, first reported the results of ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring (ABPM) using a direct arterial BP measurement method in 1969, and showed that human BP changes markedly with time. The quantity and quality of BP information vary greatly according to different methods, and the problem of interpreting clinic BP, which is obtained specifically in a medical environment, has been an issue in the clinical practice of hypertension during the past 50 years.However, the practice and epidemiology of hypertension still depend entirely on BP information obtained in a medical environment (clinic BP/BP at a health examination), resulting in the

show abstract

Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: The Finn-Home study

Cited by 105 publications

References 0 publications

Similaridade entre os valores da pressão arterial aferida pelo método auscultatório com aparelho de coluna de mercúrio e o método oscilométrico automático com aparelho digital

Similaridade entre os valores da pressão arterial aferida pelo método auscultatório com aparelho de coluna de mercúrio e o método oscilométrico automático com aparelho digital

Expert panel consensus recommendations for home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: the Hope Asia Network

The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure at Home (Second Edition)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About