2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home phototherapy in the U.K.'s National Health Service: time to reach out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two surveys in 2006 and 2017 documented that dermatologists worry about the risk of adverse reactions in patients on home phototherapy. 12,34 The main reasons were the potential use of the equipment as a tanning bed, excessive UV exposure, and the risk of side effects happening remotely from the hospital. 12 Although such fears may be unfounded, patients should be counseled on adverse effects: erythema, burning sensation, pruritus, nausea, blistering, ocular damage, theoretical risk of skin cancer, and death from accidental overexposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two surveys in 2006 and 2017 documented that dermatologists worry about the risk of adverse reactions in patients on home phototherapy. 12,34 The main reasons were the potential use of the equipment as a tanning bed, excessive UV exposure, and the risk of side effects happening remotely from the hospital. 12 Although such fears may be unfounded, patients should be counseled on adverse effects: erythema, burning sensation, pruritus, nausea, blistering, ocular damage, theoretical risk of skin cancer, and death from accidental overexposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 In a recent survey among British consultant dermatologists, only 61% were aware of home phototherapy, of whom 5% were prescribing it. 12 This situation mirrors the steady decline in utilization of phototherapy by dermatologists over the past 20 years and is unfortunate because feasibility studies document that self-administered phototherapy is safe, is effective, and saves health care cost. [13][14][15][16][17]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consequently, surveys have shown that dermatologists are hesitant to prescribe HBPT for reasons ranging from the potential use of the equipment as a tanning bed to the risk of severe AEs occurring remotely from the hospital 62,63. Lack of familiarity with the robust safety profile of HBPT magnifies such fears and also raises legal concerns, given that the prescribing physician might be held liable 64.…”
Section: Challenges and Solutions For Home-based Phototherapy For Vitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Despite this, a subsequent survey of U.K. dermatologists identified recurring themes, in addition to identifying concerns about funding, potential for medicolegal liability and training difficulties. 6 Our early experience of home phototherapy in a small number of patients has been very successful with safe and effective outcomes as well as high levels of patient satisfaction. To obtain optimal patient outcomes and ensure robust safety, we recommend careful patient selection and training, remote but close monitoring by experienced phototherapy nurses supported by a hospital-based phototherapy team, as well as clear governance arrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%