2006
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2006.9518442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home range and habitat use of introduced rusa deer(Cervus timorensis russa)in a mosaic of savannah and native sclerophyll forest of New Caledonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the parent-offspring mean gene dispersal range r estimates ranged between 0.20 and 2.02 km. This is remarkably congruent with dispersion and home-range estimates obtained by a radio-tracking study of wild rusa deer in a high deer density area of the island (Spaggiari and de Garine-Wichatitsky 2006). The average size of their home-range in that study was 5.01 ± 0.33 km 2 , whereas the average distance of wild deer relocations from the core area of their home range was 0.76 ± 0.03 km for females and 1.20 ± 0.12 km for males.…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Of Allelic Variationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the parent-offspring mean gene dispersal range r estimates ranged between 0.20 and 2.02 km. This is remarkably congruent with dispersion and home-range estimates obtained by a radio-tracking study of wild rusa deer in a high deer density area of the island (Spaggiari and de Garine-Wichatitsky 2006). The average size of their home-range in that study was 5.01 ± 0.33 km 2 , whereas the average distance of wild deer relocations from the core area of their home range was 0.76 ± 0.03 km for females and 1.20 ± 0.12 km for males.…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Of Allelic Variationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to genetics, dispersal estimates ranged between 0.20 and 2.02 km, and effective population densities between 1.4 and 3.8 individuals/km 2 , while direct observation estimates ranged from 0.76 to 1.20 km for dispersion (derived from Spaggiari and de Garine-Wichatitsky 2006) and 1-20 deer/km 2 for deer densities in some areas of the island (Chardonnet 1988;Le Bel et al 2001). This congruence, together with the panmictic behaviour advocated by the heterozygosity analysis (F IS ), confirms that rusa deer are strongly territorial (Spaggiari and de Garine-Wichatitsky 2006), with small sub-population sizes. Recent studies on red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Scotland have demonstrated variations of fine-scale genetic structure according to sex, local densities or landscape features (Nussey et al 2005;Pérez-Espona et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rusa deer on that island have small home ranges (~5 km 2 ) and display strong site fidelity over time [51]. As a result, they move ticks relatively shorter distances than Texas WTD and have a correspondingly greater IBD slope [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this can have cascade effects on biodiversity, including songbird abundance and species composition (McShea and Rappole 2000;Berger et al 2001;Fuller 2001;Allombert et al 2005a;Gill and Fuller 2007), nest predation rates (Martin and Joron 2003), the abundance and density of invertebrates (Baines et al 1994;Allombert et al 2005b;Hegland et al 2005) and the abundance and seed predation activity of small mammals (Flowerdew and Ellwood 2001;Smit et al 2001). England: major impacts on woodland herb layer composition and tree regeneration 14,28,29,30 References: 1: Moriarty (2004); 2: Hall and Gill (2005); 3: Wilson et al (2006); 4: SCI (2006); 5: Flueck et al (2003); 6: Veblen et al (1989); 7: Veblen et al (1992); 8: Relva and Veblen (1998); 9: Husheer et al (2003); 10: Ueckermann and Hansen (1994); 11: Gebhardt (1996); 12: Fraser et al (2000); 13: Lever (1985); 14: Joys et al (2004); 15: Putman et al (1989); 16: Spaggiari and De Garine-Wichatitsky (2006); 17: Osborne (1993); 18: Wiles et al (1999); 19: Pitra and Lutz (2005); 20: Heroldová (1990); 21: Keiper (1985); 22: Nowak (1999); 23: Hannaford et al (2006); 24: Bellingham and Allan (2003); 25: …”
Section: Ecosystem Impacts Of Native and Introduced Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%