Home range and movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on artificial reefs

Topping, Darin T.; Szedlmayer, Stephen T.

doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2011.08.013

Cited by 76 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This space use is consistent with that reported by Currey et al [8]. These core areas along the reef were smaller in size than for hours of twilight or darkness, which corresponds with other studies in which less movement occurred during the day than in other periods, e.g., mullids, haemulids, and lutjanids [14,24,25]. Daytime horizontal core areas for L. miniatus were generally located within the areas used during other periods, like that for Kyphosus sectatrix [26].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Assessing fine-scale diel movement patterns of an exploited coral reef fish

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Understanding movement patterns of species requires that the spatial and temporal scales of experimental designs are appropriate to the proposed ecological questions. Previous research on large-scale movements of the exploited reef fish Lethrinus miniatus suggested that adult individuals may use coral reef slope habitat during the day, shifting to adjacent deeper sandy habitat at night. However, investigation of movement at a fine spatial and temporal scale is required to verify this diel activity pattern. Using a closely positioned acoustic telemetry system, movements of 11 L. miniatus were monitored among habitats from the reef crest, to reef slope and deeper adjacent sandy habitat over 3 months. Fine-scale movement patterns among these habitats were compared among four different 3 h periods of the day: dawn, day, dusk and night.Results: Initial observations demonstrated significantly larger horizontal core areas and vertical areas of extent during crepuscular and night periods compared to during the day. Vertical space use (core area and extent) was consistently larger during dawn, dusk and night compared to during the day. Area of activity space extent within the water column and proportional overlap among areas used during different periods of the day varied among weeks, and displayed a pattern consistent with full moon periods. Conclusions:Although previous evidence suggested that L. miniatus adults may shift to deeper habitats adjacent to the reef slope at night, greater space use across the shallow crest to deeper sand habitat was observed during dawn, dusk and night periods. Increased luminosity during dawn, dusk and night periods may cause L. miniatus to utilise a larger search area for foraging. While further research is required to confirm foraging during the hours of twilight and darkness, this fine-scale approach identified patterns in nocturnal activity for an important reef teleost. Knowledge of these temporal and spatial differences in L. miniatus behaviour and movement are important to understanding how this species coexists within ecological niches.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Assessing fine-scale diel movement patterns of an exploited coral reef fish

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Certainly some disadvantages are associated with the detection limits of acoustic receivers and the variability in detection efficiency because of environmental fluctuation, and these should be accounted for through rigorous range testing (How and de Lestang 2012;Kessel et al 2014). However, using reef fish that exhibit high site fidelity, such as Red Snapper (Szedlmayer and Schroepfer 2005;Westmeyer et al 2007;Topping and Szedlmayer 2011b), increases the likelihood of detection as they typically remain within the range of receivers positioned on the structure.…”

Section: Limitations Of Acoustic Telemetrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying Delayed Mortality from Barotrauma Impairment in Discarded Red Snapper Using Acoustic Telemetry

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus is the most economically important reef fish in the Gulf of Mexico, and despite being intensively managed, the stock remains overfished. These fish are susceptible to pressure‐related injuries (i.e., barotrauma) during fishing that compromise survival after catch and release. Barotrauma‐afflicted fish may not only experience immediate mortality but also delayed mortality after returning to depth. This variability and unknown fate leads to uncertainty in stock assessment models and rebuilding plans. To generate better estimates of immediate and delayed mortality and postrelease behavior, Red Snapper were tagged with ultrasonic acoustic transmitters fitted with acceleration and depth sensors. Unique behavior profiles were generated for each fish using these sensor data that allowed the classification of survival and delayed mortality events. Using this information, we compared the survival of Red Snapper released using venting, nonventing, and descending treatments over three seasons and two depths. Red Snapper survival was highest at cooler temperatures and shallower depths. Fish released using venting and descender tools had similar survival, and both these groups of fish had higher survival than nonvented surface‐released fish. Overall, Red Snapper had 72% survival, 15% immediate mortality, and 13% delayed mortality, and all fish suffering from delayed mortality perished within a 72‐h period after release. Results from these field studies enhance the understanding of the delayed mortality and postrelease fate of Red Snapper regulatory discards. Moreover, these data support the practice of using venting or descender devices to increase the survival of discarded Red Snapper in the recreational fishery and show that acoustic telemetry can be a valuable tool in estimating delayed mortality. Received March 6, 2015; accepted July 15, 2015

show abstract

“…Our results also suggest that pairing video cameras to trawls, fisheries acoustics, or nets allows for the estimation of detection probabilities. be appropriate for rare or elusive species (Thompson 2004). Moreover, capture probability is nearly always assumed to be constant across space, time, habitat types, or environmental conditions, an assumption that is often unverified or incorrect (Hangsleben et al 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%