2009
DOI: 10.1644/07-mamm-a-380.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Range and Spatial Organization of Maned Wolves in the Brazilian Grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maned wolves were highly exposed and can also be considered a good sentinel for transmission. Accounting for its omnivorous diet and home range areas of 80 km 2 on average (Jacomo et al 2009), this species can play a unique role that is to signal the transmission in large areas, in particular in wild environments which are generally difficult to access. This was the case of maned wolves from our study that signalled the T. cruzi transmission both inside SCNP and its surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maned wolves were highly exposed and can also be considered a good sentinel for transmission. Accounting for its omnivorous diet and home range areas of 80 km 2 on average (Jacomo et al 2009), this species can play a unique role that is to signal the transmission in large areas, in particular in wild environments which are generally difficult to access. This was the case of maned wolves from our study that signalled the T. cruzi transmission both inside SCNP and its surroundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with home range sizes reported for other titi species in the genera Plecturocebus (2-20 ha) and Callicebus Geffen & MacDonald, 1992). In yet other pair-living taxa, home range borders overlap more extensively and the exclusive use is rather restricted to core areas (Azara's owl monkey, Aotus azarae: home range overlap: 41%-56%; core area overlap: 1%-18%, Wartmann et al, 2014; maned wolves, Chrysocyon brachyurus: home range overlap: 19%-23%, core area overlap: 7%-8%, de Almeida Jácomo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Potential For Territorialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could result from two strategies that are not mutually exclusive. First, when canids forage primarily on small prey such as rodents, they usually hunt alone and avoid their mate in order to increase foraging efficiency, as reported in the red fox (Poulle et al 1994), the swift fox (Kitchen et al 2005), the kit fox (White et al 2000) and the maned wolf (de Almeida Jácomo et al 2009). Arctic foxes, as lemming specialists, may also exhibit this solitary foraging behaviour, whether they forage inside or outside their territory, resulting into a low degree of simultaneous EMs.…”
Section: Simultaneous Extraterritorial Movements Between Pair Matesmentioning
confidence: 99%