2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02192408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home range size and reproduction of female roe deer re-introduced into a Mediterranean habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to theory (e.g., Griffith et al 1989;Wolf et al 1996;Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000), successes have been reported for small populations and across a wide range of demographic and environmental contexts. Departures from theory may occur because most studies of translocations use a single short-term metric to evaluate success, for example, postrelease survival (e.g., Maran et al 2009;Hamilton et al 2010;Linklater et al 2011) or fecundity (e.g., Maillard et al 2002;Dalbeck & Heg 2006;Ismail et al 2011). Survival and fecundity following release are only initial indicators of success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to theory (e.g., Griffith et al 1989;Wolf et al 1996;Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000), successes have been reported for small populations and across a wide range of demographic and environmental contexts. Departures from theory may occur because most studies of translocations use a single short-term metric to evaluate success, for example, postrelease survival (e.g., Maran et al 2009;Hamilton et al 2010;Linklater et al 2011) or fecundity (e.g., Maillard et al 2002;Dalbeck & Heg 2006;Ismail et al 2011). Survival and fecundity following release are only initial indicators of success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%