2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-014-9607-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home Telehealth Uptake and Continued Use Among Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: a Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundHome telehealth has the potential to benefit heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, however large-scale deployment is yet to be achieved.PurposeThe aim of this review was to assess levels of uptake of home telehealth by patients with HF and COPD and the factors that determine whether patients do or do not accept and continue to use telehealth.MethodsThis research performs a narrative synthesis of the results from included studies.ResultsThirty-seven studies met … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
142
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(374 reference statements)
13
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a usability perspective, there is a clear preference among patients, both in the literature [24,31,32] and in our study, for using Bluetooth-enabled peripheral devices. However, what appears most important is that patients can access TM services using devices they are most familiar with (ie, personal smartphones and tablets) [33][34][35] and that the perceived advantages of a TM program are greater than any usability inconveniences caused by manually entering biometric data [36][37][38]. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to confirm that BYOD is perceived by both clinician and patient users as a viable option for delivering TM services with a caveat that considerations are required to ensure universal accessibility.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a usability perspective, there is a clear preference among patients, both in the literature [24,31,32] and in our study, for using Bluetooth-enabled peripheral devices. However, what appears most important is that patients can access TM services using devices they are most familiar with (ie, personal smartphones and tablets) [33][34][35] and that the perceived advantages of a TM program are greater than any usability inconveniences caused by manually entering biometric data [36][37][38]. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to confirm that BYOD is perceived by both clinician and patient users as a viable option for delivering TM services with a caveat that considerations are required to ensure universal accessibility.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the usability and acceptance of the technology itself was lacking in most reviews (65), with only one review evaluating patient-nominated barriers and enablers to telehealth use and effectiveness (56). The most commonly identified barriers were technical problems, perceived redundancy, preference for in-person care, technology anxiety, difficulty remembering to interact with the system, need for technical support, and perceived repetition.…”
Section: Evidence For Effectiveness Uptake and Use Of Technology Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less than 5% of all studies included appeared in more than one systematic review, indicating the breadth and diversity of studies reviewed. The major modes of program delivery were (a) mHealth, text messaging, mobile, and/or smart-phone technologies (n = 21) (5, 7, 14, 19, 23, 35-37, 39, 41, 44, 52, 62, 80, 90, 94, 98, 104, 110, 114, 119); (b) Web-or Internet-based programs (n = 23) (3,8,15,42,49,60,70,72,78,81,82,84,89,96,105,106,108,111,118,124,129,131,135); (c) telehealth and/or telemonitoring (n = 9) (1,21,28,56,65,85,99,100,125); and (d ) social media (n = 3) (22,87,123). One review included studies of mobile and Internet-based technologies to promote physical activity for individuals with type 2 diabetes (31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However there is currently limited knowledge about the influences and determinants of home telehealth compliance in frail elderly people and their carers [22]. Their ability to adhere to a strict regime of tele-monitoring has been identified as an important influence on the success of telemonitoring programs [23] and there is a perception that patients will not adhere to a monitoring protocol and will often abandon the program [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%