Homelessness, Travel Behavior, and the Politics of Transportation Mobilities in Long Beach, California

Abstract

The geography of homelessness is often characterized as containment in marginalized spaces of cities or as placelessness necessitating continuous travel. These characterizations, which reflect discourses about`the homeless' as an imagined deviant homogeneous group, have had substantial effects on policy formation and critiques of punitive turns in urban governance. Suggested policy responses frequently assume straightforward relationships between power/powerlessness and mobility/immobility binaries that do not appropriately portray actual mobility patterns of homeless individuals. Through focus groups and structured interviews, this paper examines the daily mobility of homeless adults in Long Beach, California, to identify the ways in which the everyday travel of homeless individuals compares with these`imagined' characterizations and with national US household travel patterns. Results show that homeless mobility is highly spatially constrained and structured by sociocultural relations of stigmatization, economic productivity, and personal responsibility that are reflected in the operational conventions and institutional practices of transportation and social welfare systems. Nonetheless, during the course of a day, homeless individuals move among spaces where they experience varying levels of inclusion and exclusion, thus complicating static, homogeneous characterizations. This analysis contributes to both the urban transport and social geography literatures by demonstrating the value of combining sociocultural approaches to the study of mobility with more typical transportation geography analyses of individual travel behavior.

Modes of Attentiveness: Reading for Difference in Geographies of Homelessness

“…Yet, significantly, the little ethnographic work that has been conducted with agents of enforcement themselves suggests that, whatever the broader policy framework, there is often considerable variation in the attitudes and actions of individual police and security officers in their dealings with homeless people—depending in part on the precise qualities of the space the latter are inhabiting at the time of an encounter (Cloke et al ). Similarly, though ethnographic work with homeless people clearly demonstrates that for many people police sweeps and displacement are a daily reality (Beckett and Herbert ), those same studies also demonstrate the considerable creativity with which homeless people negotiate these restrictions; continuing to carve out a space for themselves—however tenuous—in prime as well as more marginal city spaces (Cloke et al ; Hodgetts et al ; Jocoy and Del Casino ; Sheehan ).…”

The untold flavour of street food: Social infrastructure as a means of everyday politics for street vendors in Bandung, Indonesia

“…The presence of vendors has often been in confrontation with urban regulations, leading to the constant negotiation for physical space, economic opportunity and power (Asiedu and Agyei‐Mensah, ). This situation may be exacerbated by urban infrastructure development plans that focus on accessibility and mobility, ignoring stigmatised and marginalised people (Jocoy & Del Casino, : 148). As mobility is perceived as an indicator of freedom and progress in the modern world (Cresswell, : 21), street vending activities that often occupy and congest the sidewalk and street are often perceived as incongruous with the vision for the city.…”

Homeless people and the city of abstract machines: Assemblage thinking and the performative approach to homelessness

“…Such movement can be traced back to the work of geographers like Veness (), Ruddick () and Takahashi (), and it has recently become more popular thanks to the work of scholars like Cloke et al . ( ), Jocoy and Del Casino (), Beazley () and DeVerteuil and colleagues (DeVerteuil ; DeVerteuil et al . 2009b).…”