It is increasingly apparent that the standards for surgical training are shifting from time-based to criterion-based parameters that emphasize obtaining and maintaining competencies [24]. The formation of a surgeon demands significant dedication and effort, in addition to time [54]. Current, wellestablished methods of surgical training are being challenged as the environment becomes increasingly competitive and litigious with greater scrutiny of patient outcomes [14,17,40,44,50]. In order to increase patient safety and improve treatment outcomes, several strategies such as problem-based learning and objective structured clinical examinations have promoted the development of new curricula in surgical education [13,15,35,51,52].Some of these changes have been driven by events in the 1980s and 1990s such as medical misconduct and overworked, unsupervised resident staff that contributed to patient morbidity and mortality. This also coincided with a growing medical malpractice crisis. As a result, regulatory bodies began to initiate new standards of work hour restrictions and supervision for residents in training. The New York Health Code of 1989 compiled regulations restricting resident work hours (80 h per week) and one day free a week and placed limits on the number of calls [24,32]. Concerns arose about the long-established methods of training surgical residents, and solutions were sought to reduce preventable errors and perioperative complications [24,9].The airline industry, with the development of flight simulators and pilot coaching methods, proved to be an excellent precedent for innovation in surgical education. Many surgical educators believe such methods are keys to accelerating the acquisition of fundamental skills and the rate of performance improvement among surgical residents. A Yale University study demonstrated that criterion-based simulator training decreased operating time by 30 % and operative errors by 85 % [47,48].