Homeopathy and Cancer – Some Conceptual Issues

Abstract

This paper explores some of the conceptual issues that arise when comparing homeopathy with the mainstream medical system, both in terms of their underpinning philosophies and in their treatment methods, and especially when applied to the problem of cancer. A review is under-taken of the key concepts that underpin both medical approaches: the holistic approach of homeopathy and the reductionist approach of mainstream medicine. The article closes with a discussion of the emerging conflicts between classical homeopathy and the Banerji protocols.

Traditional and contemporary herbal medicines in management of cancer: A scoping review

“…For example, traditional evidence shows that Conium maculatum (poison hemlock) ‘retards distress in glandular enlargements in scrofulous or cancerous cachexia’ [ 19 ] in doses of two to six minims of its fluid extract, but it is a well-known as a highly poisonous and deadly herb when ingested due to its toxic alkaloids affecting nerve impulse transmission to muscles causing respiratory failure [ 45 ]. Yet, Conium maculatum is still used in current homeopathic clinical practice to treat the cancer specifically as an ‘organ remedy’ in very low potencies for different cancers [ 46 ], and pre-clinical research supports the preferential cytotoxic effects in breast cancer cell lines [ 3 , 3 , 47 ](Frenkel et al, 2010)(Frenkel et al, 2010). It is imperative to note that Conium maculatum is also mistaken with Daucus carota (wild carrot) [ 48 ] used to ‘degenerate malignant ulcers and abscesses’ [ 49 ] but Daucus carota is not highly toxic when ingested.…”