Astafiev et al. question whether the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response that we reported in the brainstem was located in the locus coeruleus (LC). Using high-resolution T1-turbo spin echo images (T1-TSE) acquired in an independent group of subjects, we show that the reported task-related BOLD response in the brainstem is actually compatible with the anatomical location of the LC. (1) illustrates the fast pace at which neuroimaging techniques are currently progressing. Long-term studies requiring the recruitment of highly selective populations and complex, timeconsuming designs constrained by the physiology of sleep/wake regulation are bound to be outdated by some of their technical aspects when they come to be published. However, this does not necessarily entail that their findings are invalidated.We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the effects of sleep-wake regulation on the cerebral mechanisms supporting cognition (2). We originally identified the localization of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response using human brainstem atlases (3, 4). Statistical inferences were based on a priori coordinates from previous independent publications reporting responses in the LC [see methods described in the Supporting Online Material for (2)]. The potential anatomical inaccuracy of these approaches led us to cautiously label the reported activation as LCcompatible, a localization disputed by Astafiev et al.Here, we confirm the localization of the reported activation in the LC in a follow-up investigation with an independent group of 20 healthy young subjects (mean age, 23.6 T 2.35), using a magnetic resonance (MR) sequence sensitive to neuromelanin-related contrast. Three data sets were consecutively acquired using a 3 Tesla Allegra MR scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany): (i) an echo planar imaging (EPI) temporal series [voxel size, 3.4 ; matrix size, 400 × 512 × 10 voxels; TR, 600 ms; TE, 14 ms; FA, 90°) (Fig. 1A). The LC was manually outlined on the T1-TSE image for each subject (masked-LC image, mLC).Each individual data set was processed using the same procedure as in (2), allowing reliable comparisons with our published data set. The warped T1 and mLC images averaged across subjects reflected group-wise variability in overall brain, brainstem, and LC anatomy, as observed in (2). Figure 1B (left panel) shows the location of the peak activation reported as "LC compatible" in Schmidt et al.(1) on the mean T1 image, overlaid with the mean mLC image. The activation peak was located in the ventral and rostral part of the independently and anatomically identified LC, confirming our original claim that this activation was localized in an area compatible with this nuclear structure.To make sure that this result was not induced by an inadequate warping of the brainstem, we further applied an optimized brainstem normalization procedure to the data (5). Warped T1 images were submitted to a second brainstemspecific normalization step (affine transform, brainstem-masked T1 template), and T1, ...