Homeownership and the Labour Market in Europe 2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543946.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeownership, Social Renting, and Labour Mobility across Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these components aim to remove any financial restrictions opposing starting a new job. Germany has a rather low rate of home-ownership: 44 percent of all housing in Germany between 1994 and 2001 was owner-occupied, whereas the European average was about 71 percent in this period (De Graaf, Van Leuvensteijn, and Van Ewijk, 2009). This would suggest that the German labor market is relatively flexible compared to other European countries.…”
Section: The German Housing Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these components aim to remove any financial restrictions opposing starting a new job. Germany has a rather low rate of home-ownership: 44 percent of all housing in Germany between 1994 and 2001 was owner-occupied, whereas the European average was about 71 percent in this period (De Graaf, Van Leuvensteijn, and Van Ewijk, 2009). This would suggest that the German labor market is relatively flexible compared to other European countries.…”
Section: The German Housing Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, contrary to home-owners in other European countries, German home-owners could not simply sell their homes while making a reasonable profit to cover the costs of moving. Second, there are substantial fees for real estate agents (3 to 5 percent) and property transfer taxes (4.3 to 4.7 percent) (De Graaf, Van Leuvensteijn, and Van Ewijk, 2009). As a result of this, home-ownership is likely to limit geographical mobility in Germany.…”
Section: The German Housing Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rely on competing-risks mixed proportional hazard models as described in (4) and (5) 1989, van Leuvensteijn and Koning (2004 find that homeownership does reduce unemployment risks for employees but plays no significant role on job to job transitions or on exits to inactivity. However, de Graaff and van and de Graaff et al (2009) criticize these results for the choice of the instrument (the regional homeowner rate) is questionable and does not allow a good identification of the impact of residential status. That is why the latter make more robust estimations with a multiple-spell approach applied to the eight waves 1994-2001 of the European Community Household Panel for 14 European countries.…”
Section: Employment Duration and Labour Market Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reingold et al (2001) find similar results for the effect of public housing on social capital investment and labor participation in the US. As to labor-market outcomes, Currie and Yelowitz (1998) and de Graaff et al (2009) find negative effects of public housing. Using French data, Dujardin and Goffette-Nagot (2009) show that public housing has no direct effect on unemployment risk, even tough the concentration of public housing in deprived neighborhood may alter the public tenants' long term career opportunity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by de Graaff et al (2009) on European data, public housing tenants are less mobile on the labor market because of higher mobility costs and have therefore less job opportunities. Furthermore, the remote location of public housing often results in lower employment levels due to spatial mismatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%