2016
DOI: 10.1075/ni.26.1.02ulf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homeward bound

Abstract: With a focus on enacted narratives, this ethnographic study addresses how people with mental illness communicate returning home after a treatment stay at a psychiatric centre. Data were analysed based on Ricoeur’s theory of narrative and action. Our analysis consisted of three analytic layers: the significant issue of discharge, identifying three stories of how being on the way home is enacted, and a further interpretation and discussion. The narrative analysis shows how significant issues of returning home ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show how both Brad, Carl, Mary and Sandra use their past and present experiences from everyday activities as resources to imagine and try out plots that may support narrative meaning and thereby movement in the process of recovery. Our findings render recovery as ambiguous and openended processes of narrative meaning-making, enacted through everyday activities that involve interactions with others, adding to similar findings in other studies (Lindström et al, 2013;Mattingly, 1998;Ulfseth et al, 2015Ulfseth et al, , 2016. Emerging from our analysis, we would like to explore further how we may understand processes of narrative meaning-making in recovery as collective, as well as discuss possible implications for practice based on our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings show how both Brad, Carl, Mary and Sandra use their past and present experiences from everyday activities as resources to imagine and try out plots that may support narrative meaning and thereby movement in the process of recovery. Our findings render recovery as ambiguous and openended processes of narrative meaning-making, enacted through everyday activities that involve interactions with others, adding to similar findings in other studies (Lindström et al, 2013;Mattingly, 1998;Ulfseth et al, 2015Ulfseth et al, , 2016. Emerging from our analysis, we would like to explore further how we may understand processes of narrative meaning-making in recovery as collective, as well as discuss possible implications for practice based on our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Demonstrating the relationality of narratives of recovery, several studies show how everyday activities that put us in touch with others are particularly valuable to create meaning. When doing activities together, the persons involved try out possible plots in collaboration, seeking to create narratives that make meaning to everyone involved (Lindström et al, 2013;Ørjasaeter et al, 2017;Reed et al, 2018;Ulfseth et al, 2015Ulfseth et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%