2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homoclinic tangencies versus uniform hyperbolicity for conservative 3-flows

Abstract: We prove that a volume-preserving three-dimensional flow can be C 1 -approximated by a volume-preserving Anosov flow or else by another volume-preserving flow exhibiting a homoclinic tangency. This proves the conjecture of Palis for conservative 3-flows and with respect to the C 1 -topology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the divergence-free setting, Bessa and Rocha [30] considered a three-dimensional manifold M, proving the next result.…”
Section: Pujals and Sambarinomentioning
confidence: 51%
“…On the divergence-free setting, Bessa and Rocha [30] considered a three-dimensional manifold M, proving the next result.…”
Section: Pujals and Sambarinomentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Main results. By [6], the existence of hyperbolic equilibria implies that the flow is not C 1 -near an Anosov one and thus, C 1 -close to the flow, tangencies are expected. Furthermore, by [7], arbitrarily C 1 -close to a conservative flow displaying a Bykov cycle, we may find an incompressible flow with a dense set of elliptic periodic solutions.…”
Section: Corollary 1 the Condition (H4) Is Persistent Under Isotopiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first author and Duarte proved in [7] that the set of C 1 -divergence-free vector fields defined in a compact three-dimensional Riemannian manifold without boundary, has a C 1 -residual set such that any vector field inside it is Anosov or else, the flow associated to it has dense elliptic solutions in the phase space. Furthermore, in [6], also in this context, the authors proved that if the vector field is not Anosov, then it can be C 1 -approximated by another divergence-free vector field exhibiting homoclinic tangencies. However, a conservative vector field whose flow has a persistent Bykov cycle may lie outside these residual/dense subsets and the developed theory cannot be applied for this degenerated class of systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, any divergence-free vector field defined on a 3-dimensional closed manifold can be C 1 -approximated in the same class by a vector field either Anosov or with a homoclinic tangency associated to a hyperbolic closed orbit [4]. This was recently generalized in [9] for a d-dimensional closed manifold, d ≥ 4: any divergence-free vector field can be C 1 -approximated by another one satisfying either one of the properties of the 3-dimensional case, or with a heterodimensional cycle.…”
Section: An Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was recently generalized in [9] for a d-dimensional closed manifold, d ≥ 4: any divergence-free vector field can be C 1 -approximated by another one satisfying either one of the properties of the 3-dimensional case, or with a heterodimensional cycle. Here we address the problem of obtaining a version of [4] in the Hamiltonian context.…”
Section: An Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%