2013
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20134501076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogeneous droplet nucleation modeled using the gradient theory combined with the PC-SAFT equation of state

Abstract: Abstract. In this work, we used the density gradient theory (DGT) combined with the cubic equation of state (EoS) by Peng and Robinson (PR) and the perturbed chain (PC) modification of the SAFT EoS developed by Gross and Sadowski [1]. The PR EoS is based on very simplified physical foundations, it has significant limitations in the accuracy of the predicted thermodynamic properties. On the other hand, the PC-SAFT EoS combines different intermolecular forces, e.g., hydrogen bonding, covalent bonding, Coulombic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to simulate, how the thermal motion of molecules affects (lowers) the surface tension for planar phase interface. New molecular simulations would support our theoretical work [6,7,[20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…to simulate, how the thermal motion of molecules affects (lowers) the surface tension for planar phase interface. New molecular simulations would support our theoretical work [6,7,[20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The Cahn-Hilliard density gradient theory [1,20,21] can successfully be applied on planar [22,23] and also on spherical phase interfaces [24,25]. In GT, the following Euler-Lagrange equation has to be satisfied by the interfacial density profile…”
Section: Density Gradient Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature review, we only found a few publications attempting to apply the DGT model to spherical interfaces. However, these authors either did not conduct any IFT calculations 25 or did the IFT calculation by combining DGT with Young−Laplace equation, 26 sacrificing DGT's advantages at the nanoscale.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%