2014
DOI: 10.1093/qjmam/hbu019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenisation for hexagonal lattices and honeycomb structures

Abstract: A high-frequency asymptotic scheme is generated that captures the motion of waves within discrete hexagonal and honeycomb lattices by creating continuum homogenised equations. The accuracy of these effective medium equations in describing the frequency-dependent anisotropy of the lattice structure is demonstrated. We then extend the general formulation by introducing line defects, often called armchair or zigzag line defects for honeycomb lattices such as graphene, into an otherwise perfect lattice creating su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low-lying dispersion surfaces of honeycomb Schrödinger operators in the strong binding regime, where the potential is the superposition of a general class of atomic potential wells, and its relation to the tight-binding limit, was studied in [29]. Tight binding models have been studied extensively in the fundamental and applied physics and mathematics communities; see, for example, [1,6,17,20].…”
Section: Connections To Previous Rigorous Analytical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-lying dispersion surfaces of honeycomb Schrödinger operators in the strong binding regime, where the potential is the superposition of a general class of atomic potential wells, and its relation to the tight-binding limit, was studied in [29]. Tight binding models have been studied extensively in the fundamental and applied physics and mathematics communities; see, for example, [1,6,17,20].…”
Section: Connections To Previous Rigorous Analytical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stand of the mathematical understanding of graphene is comparably less developed. All available results are extremely recent and concern the modeling of transport properties of electrons in graphene sheets [3,6,13,16,25,34,35], homogenization [8,33], atomistic-to-continuum passage for nanotubes [14], geometry of monolayers under Gaussian perturbations [11], external charges [27] or magnetic fields [10], combinatorial description of graphene patches [22], and numerical simulation of dynamics via nonlocal elasticity theory [44]. Remarkably, the determination of the equilibrium shapes and the Wulff shapes of graphene samples and graphene nanostructures is still a challenging problem [1,5,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the two-band tight-binding model gives an accurate approximation of the low-lying dispersion surfaces in the regime of strong binding was proved in [24]; see also Remark 1.9 below. Other results on Dirac points for Schroedinger operators on R 2 may be found in [1,2,14,27,38], coupled oscillator models [43] and on quantum graphs in [17,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%