2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2017.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization and non-homogenization of certain non-convex Hamilton–Jacobi equations

Abstract: Abstract. We continue the study of the homogenization of coercive non-convex Hamilton-Jacobi equations in random media identifying two general classes of Hamiltonians with very distinct behavior. For the first class there is no homogenization in a particular environment while for the second homogenization takes place in environments with finite range dependence. Motivated by the recent counter-example of Ziliotto [18], who constructed a coercive but non-convex Hamilton-Jacobi equation with stationary ergodic r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ziliotto [42] gave a counterexample to homogenization of (4.1) in case n = 2. See also the paper by Feldman and Souganidis [21]. Basically, [42,21] implies that, in some specific cases, even if H has strict saddle points, H − V is still regularly homogenizable for every V with large oscillation.…”
Section: Appendix: Some Application In Random Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziliotto [42] gave a counterexample to homogenization of (4.1) in case n = 2. See also the paper by Feldman and Souganidis [21]. Basically, [42,21] implies that, in some specific cases, even if H has strict saddle points, H − V is still regularly homogenizable for every V with large oscillation.…”
Section: Appendix: Some Application In Random Homogenizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of non-convexity has been understood better recently, see e.g. [4,24,37]. Instead this paper gives a very general class of examples which are convex (but not strictly) but non-coercive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the exception of a case with Hamiltonians of a very special form (see Armstrong, Tran and Yu [3,5]), the main results known in nonconvex settings are quantitative. That is it is necessary to make some strong assumptions on the environment (finite range dependence) and to use sophisticated concentration inequalities to prove directly that the solutions of the oscillatory problems converge; see, for example, Armstrong and Cardaliaguet [3] and Feldman and Souganidis [8]. It should be noted that the counterexamples of Ziliotto [17] and [8] yield that in the setting of nonconvex homogenization in random media is not possible to prove the existence of correctors for all directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%