2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-009-9219-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization Based LES for Turbulent Combustion

Abstract: In this work we propose a novel methodology for performing Large Eddy Simulations (LES) of premixed, non-premixed and partially premixed laminar and turbulent flames. The motivation behind this study is the need for more accurate and flexible LES computations of increasingly complex engineering applications, for which current LES models are limited. The main drawback of present LES methods for reactive flows is that most of the chemical activity, and thus also most of the exothermicity, occurs on the subgrid s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further downstream at x/h = 5 and x/h = 7 the reaction rate prediction from the FTI (transport equation) model increases while the FTI (algebraic) model tends to predict a constant reaction rate as shown in figures 8c, 8d, 9d and 9e. An increase in the reaction rate in these regions is expected in the light of earlier results of Fureby [38] as regions of intense turbulence are bounded by the shear layer which widens as the distance from the step increases, thus leading to a much wider reaction zone. In order to quantify the difference between different models, percentage difference for the predicted peak reaction rate between the FTI (transport equation) and the other models is reported in table 3 for several locations downstream of the backward facing step.…”
Section: Reacting Flow Calculationmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further downstream at x/h = 5 and x/h = 7 the reaction rate prediction from the FTI (transport equation) model increases while the FTI (algebraic) model tends to predict a constant reaction rate as shown in figures 8c, 8d, 9d and 9e. An increase in the reaction rate in these regions is expected in the light of earlier results of Fureby [38] as regions of intense turbulence are bounded by the shear layer which widens as the distance from the step increases, thus leading to a much wider reaction zone. In order to quantify the difference between different models, percentage difference for the predicted peak reaction rate between the FTI (transport equation) and the other models is reported in table 3 for several locations downstream of the backward facing step.…”
Section: Reacting Flow Calculationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Further details of the experiment and measuring techniques used can be found in [24,25]. This test case has been previously studied by Weller et al [37] (using flame wrinkling model) and Fureby [38] (using the newly proposed homogenisation based method) via Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and by Tangermann et al [39] (using a modified flame surface density model) via both Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) approaches. This case represents a dump combustor configuration in gas turbine engines.…”
Section: Test Configuration and Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale vortex structures are calculated by integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations [2,3]. To obtain the filtered equations the boxed filter is used.…”
Section: Mathematic Model and Calculation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of flows occurs in various technical devices, including combustion chambers of aircraft engines and helicopters. The main feature of such flows is the formation of large-scale structures in the mixing layer behind a step, which is used as a flame stabilizer [1,2]. The extension of the mixing layer is determined by the dynamics of large vortices development, which are formed upstream and increase as the result of neighboring vortices merging and inclusions of viscous gases from the main flow (Fig.1).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%