2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-008-9203-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of Climate Data: Review and New Perspectives Using Geostatistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
138
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the Standard Normal Homogeneity Test (Alexandersson, 1986), a location specific homogeneity test, was applied to examine the consistence of rainfall data. This test assumes that the data collected at all sites within a same climatic region should be highly correlated, have similar variability, and differ only by scaling factors and random sampling variability (Costa and Soares, 2009), therefore, homogeneity of a data series can be checked by comparing with a single or multiple reference series (Toreti et al, 2011). For rainfall records at each of the 298 stations, the homogeneity was examined by comparing the annual rainfall value with four highly correlated reference series from the surrounding stations, following the procedure in literature (Jiang et al, 2008;Khaliq and Ouarda, 2007;Liu and Sun, 1995).…”
Section: Rainfall Data and The Homogeneity Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the Standard Normal Homogeneity Test (Alexandersson, 1986), a location specific homogeneity test, was applied to examine the consistence of rainfall data. This test assumes that the data collected at all sites within a same climatic region should be highly correlated, have similar variability, and differ only by scaling factors and random sampling variability (Costa and Soares, 2009), therefore, homogeneity of a data series can be checked by comparing with a single or multiple reference series (Toreti et al, 2011). For rainfall records at each of the 298 stations, the homogeneity was examined by comparing the annual rainfall value with four highly correlated reference series from the surrounding stations, following the procedure in literature (Jiang et al, 2008;Khaliq and Ouarda, 2007;Liu and Sun, 1995).…”
Section: Rainfall Data and The Homogeneity Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stations which were found not to be homogenous by three or more tests at 5 % significance were only analyzed for study at station level and excluded from regional analyses. This decision was based on reasons which can be found in the literature such as Easterling et al (1996), Peterson et al (1998a, b), Costa andSoares (2009), Domonkos (2011), and others. Therefore, for further analysis, the following station annual series were not used in generating a regional average rainfall series, namely Bumagi, Kabasanda, Kigorobya, Bugoye, Kisomoro, Kyembogo, Kijura, Masindi, Nalweyo, Kakumiro, Kyegegwa, and Rwashamaire (Table 1).…”
Section: Quality Control and Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that BPs can be triggered by non-climate factors (e.g. instrument exposure, land use, location changes) has also been studied [27,30,31,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%