2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2009.08.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of CZ Si wafers by Tabula Rasa annealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wafers without TR process the oxygen was completely precipitated already after 12 h at 1000 1C, however the shortest TR process prolonged the precipitation at least twice, see the results for wafers close to ingot seed in Refs. [14]. We observed a similar effect also in the wafers from the ingot end.…”
Section: Measurement and Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the wafers without TR process the oxygen was completely precipitated already after 12 h at 1000 1C, however the shortest TR process prolonged the precipitation at least twice, see the results for wafers close to ingot seed in Refs. [14]. We observed a similar effect also in the wafers from the ingot end.…”
Section: Measurement and Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Even though the amount of O i in preanneled samples is slightly higher than in the non preannealed ones, no significant differences were detected in Laue diffraction curves between all 2mm samples annealed within the process -(not) preannealed + 600°C/24h + 800°C /4h + 1000°C/x h. The effect of preannealing was below the sensitivity of these measurements. Moreover according to previous observations, the preannealing can initiate some precipitates to grow even further to very large values [9] having much larger strain area and these would influence mainly the coherent peak close to η = 0° and less the diffuse scattering far from the coherent diffraction peak. All the diffraction curves from defect samples in figure 5 were modeled assuming silicon crystal containing also three sizes of spherical holes.…”
Section: Fig 3: Intensities Of Transmitted (Upper Curves) and Diffrac...supporting
confidence: 56%