2018
DOI: 10.5802/jep.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of periodic graph-based elastic structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, we provide in Fig. 6 the value of C 1,1 111111 as function of the number of periods. It is observed that the component C 1,1 111111 decreases with the number of periods while the quantity N 2 C 1,1 111111 is independent.…”
Section: Basic Results With Periodic Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, we provide in Fig. 6 the value of C 1,1 111111 as function of the number of periods. It is observed that the component C 1,1 111111 decreases with the number of periods while the quantity N 2 C 1,1 111111 is independent.…”
Section: Basic Results With Periodic Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it has been demonstrated that the effective elastic energy of lattice materials having soft modes of deformation can be of generalized type [3]. Some general results have been obtained in [2,1] combining asymptotic analysis and Γ-convergence method. However even if a method to determine the higher-order parameters was proposed in this last reference it fails when the first order elasticity is not degenerated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…assuming that, inside each cell, only pairs of nodes (1, 2), (1,3), (1,4), (1,5), (2,5), (3,4), (4,6), (5,6) are interacting, assuming that nodes 4 and 5 of each cell are respectively interacting with nodes 3 and 2 of the next cell following εt 1 (with t 1 = (1, 0, 0)) and assuming moreover that node 6 of each cell is interacting with both nodes 3 and 2 of the next cell following εt 1 , we get a pantographic beam as shown in Figure 6. Assuming moreover that node 1 of each cell is interacting with node 1 of the next cells following εt 2 and εt 3 (with t 2 = (0, √ 3, −1) and t 3 = (0, √ 3, 1)) we get a 3D structure as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Pantographic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually generalized continua can be proven to be Γ-limits of systems described at micro-level as first gradient continua. [2,3,91,92] On the other hand, it is possible to regard a beam as an energetic boundary curve on a two-dimensional manifold in a three-dimensional space and employ the frameworks developed in [73,77,78] and even account for higher gradients elaborated in [75]. The advantage of this approach is that the fictitious bulk material can regularize the behavior of the beam and this allows to analyze buckling in a computational framework.…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Some Illustrative Examples Of Pantographic Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make this discussion complete, and make happy those who consider continuum models more important, we can recall here that recently some Γ‐convergence results have been proven that Hencky's model is a fully reliable approximation of continuous inextensible and extensible Euler–Bernoulli beams. Actually generalized continua can be proven to be Γ‐limits of systems described at micro‐level as first gradient continua . On the other hand, it is possible to regard a beam as an energetic boundary curve on a two‐dimensional manifold in a three‐dimensional space and employ the frameworks developed in [] and even account for higher gradients elaborated in [].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%