2017
DOI: 10.15407/mag13.02.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenized Model of Non-Stationary Diffusion in Porous Media with the Drift

Abstract: We consider an initial boundary-value problem for a parabolic equation describing non-stationary diffusion in porous media with non-linear absorption on the boundary and the transfer of the diffusing substance by fluid. We prove the existence of the unique solution for this problem. We study the asymptotic behavior of a sequence of solutions when the scale of microstructure tends to zero and obtain the homogenized model of the diffusion process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence and uniqueness of solutions of is quite classical. It can be obtained using an adaptation of the Galerkin method to nonlinear problems: See Ladyzhenskaya et al and Lions in connection with the method and different nonlinear problems; see, eg, Goncharenko and Khilkova, Goncharenko and Jagër et al for different methods in volume perforated media. Note that under the conditions ( n ≤ 4, respectively) the integral Sϵσfalse(x,uϵfalse)v0.1emdsx1em ( Ωϵuϵtrueoverrightarrowvϵ.v0.1emdx, respectively) arising in the weak formulation is well defined, cf Brillard et al and .…”
Section: Setting Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The existence and uniqueness of solutions of is quite classical. It can be obtained using an adaptation of the Galerkin method to nonlinear problems: See Ladyzhenskaya et al and Lions in connection with the method and different nonlinear problems; see, eg, Goncharenko and Khilkova, Goncharenko and Jagër et al for different methods in volume perforated media. Note that under the conditions ( n ≤ 4, respectively) the integral Sϵσfalse(x,uϵfalse)v0.1emdsx1em ( Ωϵuϵtrueoverrightarrowvϵ.v0.1emdx, respectively) arising in the weak formulation is well defined, cf Brillard et al and .…”
Section: Setting Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, taking into account that the Sobolev embedding from H 1 (Ω ϵ , ∂ Ω) into L q (Ω ϵ ) is continuous when q2nn2, we can write ||Ωϵuϵtrueoverrightarrowvϵ.v0.1emdxCϵfalse‖trueoverrightarrowvϵfalse‖Lnfalse(Ωϵfalse)false‖uϵfalse‖L2false(Ωϵfalse)false‖vfalse‖L2false(Ωϵfalse),1emwhen2.56804ptn4. The same restriction holds for the weak formulations of the homogenized problems due to the term divfalse(utrueoverrightarrowv0false). Let us refer to Brillard et al for more details about the proof of and to Goncharenko and Khilkova for different restrictions on trueoverrightarrowvϵ that could avoid the restriction on n but that might not work when justifying the weak formulation of the homogenized problems, cf, eg, and . Note that the estimate proves to be essential in order to obtain uniform bounds for the solutions, cf , and show convergence.…”
Section: Extensions and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations