2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenous, real-time duplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification using a single fluorophore-labeled primer and an intercalator dye: Its application to the simultaneous detection of Shiga toxin genes 1 and 2 in Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In direct contrast, the development of serogroup-specific LAMP assays was confined to E. coli O157 only (46,52,53). The detection limits of the seven serogroup-specific LAMP assays developed in the present study (1 to 20 CFU/reaction mixture) fell well within the limits reported for previous E. coli LAMP studies (24,26,29,41,46,(50)(51)(52)(53), i.e., 0.7 to 100 CFU/reaction mixture. In addition, the findings of this study corroborated those of two others (8,47) that suggested comparable sensitivities of LAMP and qPCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In direct contrast, the development of serogroup-specific LAMP assays was confined to E. coli O157 only (46,52,53). The detection limits of the seven serogroup-specific LAMP assays developed in the present study (1 to 20 CFU/reaction mixture) fell well within the limits reported for previous E. coli LAMP studies (24,26,29,41,46,(50)(51)(52)(53), i.e., 0.7 to 100 CFU/reaction mixture. In addition, the findings of this study corroborated those of two others (8,47) that suggested comparable sensitivities of LAMP and qPCR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Parallel to the work presented here, we recently developed and evaluated a set of serogroup-independent STEC LAMP assays by targeting common STEC virulence genes (stx 1 , stx 2 , and eae), and the performance of those assays in pure cultures and ground beef closely mimicked that observed in the present study (47). Additional LAMP assays for STEC (24,29,32) and other pathogenic E. coli groups (41, 50, 51) have been reported. In direct contrast, the development of serogroup-specific LAMP assays was confined to E. coli O157 only (46,52,53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Previously, LAMP assays have been developed for the detection of generic (22) and pathogenic E. coli, including enteroaggregative E. coli (44), enteroinvasive E. coli (37), enterotoxigenic E. coli (43), STEC (20,28,29), and more specifically, E. coli O157:H7 (40,46,47). With 35 min to 1 h of reaction time, these LAMP assays were capable of detecting between 0.7 and 100 CFU of E. coli per reaction, 10-to 100-fold more sensitive than conventional PCR (20,22,28,37,40,44,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 35 min to 1 h of reaction time, these LAMP assays were capable of detecting between 0.7 and 100 CFU of E. coli per reaction, 10-to 100-fold more sensitive than conventional PCR (20,22,28,37,40,44,47). The three LAMP assays developed here fell within these detection ranges in terms of speed and sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is isothermal, LAMP can be performed in much simpler instruments, such as a heater or water bath. To date, multiple LAMP assays targeting STEC Shiga toxin genes (stx 1 and stx 2 ) have been developed (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and evaluated in food, primarily beef (25)(26)(27)(28), as have several others targeting the E. coli O157 rfbE gene (encoding perosamine synthetase) (23,24,(29)(30)(31). Very recently, we developed a suite of LAMP assays for STEC (targeting common virulence genes stx 1 , stx 2 , and eae) and the seven adulterant STEC serogroups (targeting the wzx or wzy gene on the respective O-antigen gene clusters) (32,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%