2011
DOI: 10.4171/ggd/144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homological and homotopical higher-order filling functions

Abstract: Abstract. We construct groups in which FV 3 .n/ oe ı 2 .n/. This construction also leads to groups G k , k 3, for which ı k .n/ is not subrecursive.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 20F65, 57M07.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If dim M D 2 then the same statement holds; this is proved below in Lemma 7.4. The case dim M D 3 is different: Young [23] has constructed a group G such that if M is a 3-manifold with boundary S 1 S 1 , then ı M .x/ is strictly larger than ı .2/ .x/.…”
Section: More General Dehn Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If dim M D 2 then the same statement holds; this is proved below in Lemma 7.4. The case dim M D 3 is different: Young [23] has constructed a group G such that if M is a 3-manifold with boundary S 1 S 1 , then ı M .x/ is strictly larger than ı .2/ .x/.…”
Section: More General Dehn Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case in higher dimensions, however. For each k > 2, Young [23] constructs a group for which ı .k/ .x/ is not subrecursive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corollary 3, for a (simplicial) version of δ k . This is equivalent to the above (compare [48]). The second claim follows from [24], 2.A', for upper bounds and [10], 2.6.…”
Section: The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We emphasize that Young constructed examples of groups Γ acting geometrically on a space X for which δ 2 Γ ∼ FV 3 X (see [48], Corollary 6). If, however, X = S × E × B is as in Theorem 1, then we also have δ 2 X ≻ FV 3 X .…”
Section: The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.3. These notions are equivalent to the ones defined in [BBFS,You1] using admissible maps, as well as to the ones in [AWP], and those in [BH, p.153], [Bri2], [Ril,§2.3] that are using more polyhedra than just simplices.…”
Section: Higher Dimensional Isoperimetric Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%