2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2009.06738
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homological invariants of codimension 2 contact submanifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is another method to differ contact submanifolds via studying contact homology coupled with the intersection data with the holomorphic hypersurface given by the symplectization of the contact submanifold. Such invariants were introduced by Côté and Fauteux-Chapleau [7], where they reproved [5, Theorem 1.1] for (S 4n − 1, ξ std ) and n > 1.…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another method to differ contact submanifolds via studying contact homology coupled with the intersection data with the holomorphic hypersurface given by the symplectization of the contact submanifold. Such invariants were introduced by Côté and Fauteux-Chapleau [7], where they reproved [5, Theorem 1.1] for (S 4n − 1, ξ std ) and n > 1.…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another method to distinguish contact submanifolds via studying contact homology coupled with the intersection data with the holomorphic hypersurface given by the symplectization of the contact submanifold. Such invariants were introduced in [7] by Côté and Fauteux-Chapleau, who used them to provide an alternative proof that some of different contact submanifolds built in [4] via contact push-off are indeed not contact isotopic, reproving [4, Theorem 1.1] for (𝑆 4𝑛−1 , 𝜉 std ) and 𝑛 > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%